'Down about 6 pc': Zerodha CEO Nithin Kamath cautions against investing in digital gold
Rishabh Pant joins Sanjiv Goenka in Kolkata as LSG begin crucial IPL 2026 retention discussions
Navale Bridge Accident: 8 dead, 20 injured as car gets crushed between 2 container trucks in Pune
IPL 2026: After Shardul Thakur, Mumbai Indians make another big trade - Full details inside
Bihar Election 2025: BJP must win THESE 50 seats to stay in power
IPL 2026: Kavya Maran's SRH set to release Mohammed Shami as LSG, DC clash in fierce trade war
BUSINESS
RBI said the information submitted by Paytm payments bank for the issue of final Certificate of Authorisation did not reflect the factual position.
The Reserve Bank of India has imposed a monetary penalty worth Rs 1 crore on Paytm Payments Bank for violating its guidelines.
In a press statement, the central bank said that the fine is related to an offence committed of the nature referred to in Section 26 (2) of Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (PSS Act).
RBI said that while examining Paytm payments bank’s application for the issue of final Certificate of Authorisation, it was found that the information it had submitted did not reflect the factual position.
“As this was an offence of the nature referred to in Section 26 (2) of the PSS Act, a notice was issued to PPBL. After reviewing the written responses and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, the RBI determined that the aforementioned charge was substantiated and warranted the imposition of a monetary penalty,” the statement from the central bank read.
Earlier this week, RBI imposed a monetary penalty of Rs 1 crore on India's largest public lender State Bank of India (SBI) for non-compliance with the directions contained in "RBI (Frauds classification and reporting by commercial banks and select FIs directions 2016".
As per the central bank, the action was based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.
The penalty was imposed in the exercise of powers vested in RBI under the provisions of section 47A (1) (c) read with sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
Scrutiny was carried out by the RBI in a customer account maintained with the bank and the examination of the scrutiny report and all related correspondence pertaining to the same, revealed, inter alia, non-compliance with the aforesaid directions to the extent of delay in reporting of fraud in the said account to RBI.