Twitter
Advertisement

PMO protests against 'unethical' 'Washington Post' article on PM

The PMO has lodged a formal protest with Washington Post newspaper for an article critical of Manmohan Singh, saying that the journalist's conduct was "unethical and unprofessional".

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) has lodged a formal protest with Washington Post newspaper for an article critical of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, saying that the journalist's conduct was "unethical and unprofessional".

The PMO, in its reaction posted on the US-based newspaper's website, has said the story was "totally one-sided" as the journalist "never" got in touch with the PMO for its version.

"We do not complain about criticism of the government which is a journalist’s right. But I am writing this letter for pointing out unethical and unprofessional conduct at your part," said a letter by Pankaj Pachauri, Communications Adviser to the Prime Minister’s Office.

In the letter, Pachauri has complained that the journalist "despite all lines of conversations open", never "got in touch with us for our side of the story though you regularly talk to me about information from the PMO. This story thus becomes totally one sided."

Pachauri refers to the journalist Simon Denyer's mention that his request for an interview was declined and says that his mail had clearly stated that interview was declined 'till the Monsoon Session' of Parliament which gets over tomorrow.

With regard to quotes attributed to former Media Adviser to the PM Sanjaya Baru, Pachauri has stated that he has complained that Denyer 'rehashed and used' an eight-month-old quote from an Indian magazine.

"We expected better from the correspondent of the Washington Post for fair and unbiased reporting," the letter states.

In its rejoinder, the PMO spokesperson wrote to Denyer: "You have been telling the media here in India that your request for an interview was declined though the mail below says clearly that the interview was declined 'till the monsoon session' of Parliament which gets over in two days.

"When I rang you up to point this out, you said sorry twice though you tell the media here that you never apologised.

"Your website where we could have posted a reply is still not working, 11 hours after you said sorry the third time for its inaccessibility."

Responding to this, Denyer wrote on the Post: "when I made my final request for an interview with the PM in July, I was told on July 30 'The PM has declined all interview requests till the monsoon session is over.' At that stage, the current session of Parliament (known as the monsoon session) of Parliament had not even begun. There was no mention of the possibility of an interview afterwards."

He said his "apology was for the fact that the website was down and the PM’s office could not post a reply directly. As soon as the problem was fixed, I informed them. I stand by the story."

Amid objections by the PMO, the Washington Post published a correction with regard to parts attributed to Baru and political historian Ramachandra Guha.

"An earlier version of this article failed to credit the Caravan, an Indian magazine, for two statements that it originally published in 2011.

"The assertion by Sanjaya Baru, a former media adviser, that Singh had become an object of ridicule and endured the worst period in his life first appeared in the Caravan, as did an assertion by Ramachandra Guha, a political historian, that Singh was handicapped by his 'timidity, complacency and intellectual dishonesty.

"While both men told The Post that the assertions could accurately be attributed to them, the article should have credited the Caravan when it used or paraphrased the remarks. The article has been updated," said the correction.

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement