Last night home secretary GK Pillai said that India was not taking cognisance of US envoy in New Delhi Timothy J Roemer's remarks and would be sending its investigators to the US at the earliest.
Union home minister P Chidambaram has said that there was no confusion over the issue of Indian investigators getting direct access to Pakistani-American LeT operative David Coleman Headley or not.
"No, I don't think so," Chidambaram shot back when asked whether there was a U-turn by the US after its envoy in New Delhi Timothy J Roemer said that "no decision on direct access for India to David Headley has been made."
"...If you reflect more carefully that sentence (of Roemer) no way (it) contradicts what the US Attorney (Eric Holder) has told me," Chidambaram, who is here on an official visit, told a TV news channel.
Last night home secretary GK Pillai said that India was not taking cognisance of Roemer's remarks and would be sending its investigators to the US at the earliest.
"I think we are going ahead and we are not really taking cognisance of the US ambassador's remarks," he said.
Headley, 49, had last week pleaded guilty to all the 12 terror charges of conspiracy involving bombing public places in India, murdering and maiming persons and providing material support to foreign terrorist plots and Pakistan-based LeT besides aiding and abetting the murder of six US citizens in the 26/11 attacks that killed 166 people.
Following a telephonic discussion with Holder, Chidambaram had directed National Intelligence Agency and other agencies concerned in the case to quickly prepare documents necessary to start a judicial proceeding in which Indian authorities could require Headley to answer questions and to testify.
India is likely to send a team of investigators in April to question Headley.
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
)
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
)
)
)
)
)
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}