Home > India > Column

Judges want no bar on retirement age

Rakesh Bhatnagar
Sunday, July 26, 2009 23:16 IST
Email Email
Print Print
Share Share
Rakesh Bhatnagar
Syndicate
this column

Should the government succumb to the demand of superior judges and enhance their retirement age? This question becomes a debatable issue when there are serious concerns about the quality of dispensation and the merits of a section of judiciary. Judges have demanded a hike in their superannuation age from 62 to 65 years in high court (HC), and 65 to 68 years in the Supreme Court (SC).

Chief justice KG Balakrishnan said the abolition of the practice of retiring SC and HC judges at the prescribed age -- 62 for HC judges and 65 for SC judged -- to impart greater stability to the legal system. It will also tackle the perennial problem of shortage of judges, he said.

Speaking at the 5th national conference of the association of retired judges at Indore on April 21, 2007, CJI said: "Superannuation of SC judges at 65 "is a sheer waste of their abilities, expertise and experience, since that's the age when their intellectual faculties are at their peak."

The committee that reviewed the functioning of the Constitution also suggested 68 years as the retirement age for SC judges and 65 years for HC judges.

Protagonists of judges' case say, in 1950, when the Constitution came into force, the average life span in our country was 30 years. Now, it is 70 years. Thus, the retirement age bar should be elevated.

But this argument can stand judicial scrutiny only if government employees also get similar relief. If it is accepted that the retirement age of judges should be hiked to make use of their "mature" capabilities, there's no reason why civil and military personnel should be denied the lucrative extended tenure.

However, increasing the age tenure may not be medically advisable as they may suffer from various ailments related to old-age.

Prof Madhuri Behari, head, Department of Neurology (AIIMS), said at a symposium that Parkinson's disease affects 8 to 9 lakh people in India every year. "This ailment affects the older sections of society. And with life expectancy for Indians now at 67 years, the situation in the country has become more serious as it makes the larger portion of society vulnerable to the disease," she said.

Moreover, persons in the medical profession do not rule out the possibility of memory loss among other diseases, which can affect most around and after the age of 60 years.

Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article.
For reprint rights click here
digg reddit google Facebook MySpace delicious

Post your comment

Readers' comments:
This is in line with developed countries. India's demographic strength lies in using its population in the working age group to add to the GDP in place of paying pension to such people. The retirement age at 60 was fixed 10 years ago. It is high time this is enhanced to 62.
Sunday, August 9, 2009 15:21 IST
shila, Mumbai
Dress me up
The preview of designers Shantanu and Nikhil's cocktail line of dresses hosted by Naseeb Kapoor and Sharmilla Khanna at Samsaara.
Adventurous women!
The Cosmopolitan Fun Fearless Female awards saw a galaxy of stars descend on the venue to be awarded in various categories.

Get daily news in your inbox and read it at your convenience.

D