Arjun Tendulkar-Saaniya Chandhok wedding: PM Modi blesses couple on Sachin Tendulkar's invitation
Abhishek Sharma to miss match against Namibia in New Delhi? Here's what we know so far
Naravane's Memoir Row: Ex- Army Chief clarifies after Rahul Gandhi questions publisher's claim
JEE Main Result 2026: Answer key to be out soon at jeemain.nta.nic.in, know how to check
Govt mandates labelling AI, deepfake content; introduces new rules
Hindu killed hours before polls, can minorities vote freely in Bangladesh Elections 2026?
Manipur violence: Tension escalates in Ukhrul, internet shut down for 5 days
MUMBAI
The plea challenges the validity of Indian Penal Code section 376 (e), under which the trio had been granted death for gang-raping a photojournalist at the derelict Shakti Mills compound in Mahalaxmi in 2013.
Justifying the legislature’s decision to provide the death penalty for a repeat offence of rape, the Union government Wednesday told the Bombay High Court that rape laws had been amended in 2013 to introduce a powerful deterrent against such crimes.
“Rape not only affects the person but also the soul. The state not only has a duty to punish the offender but also deter future crimes,” the Union said while opposing a writ petition by convicts Vijay Jadhav, Kasim Bengali and Salim Ansari.
The plea challenges the validity of Indian Penal Code section 376 (e), under which the trio had been granted death for gang-raping a photojournalist at the derelict Shakti Mills compound in Mahalaxmi in 2013. The plea said the section was introduced arbitrarily.
But additional Solicitor General Anil Singh opposed the grounds raised by the petitioners saying that the amended section does not create a new category of offenders. And the constitutional power of commutation by the Governor/President is not taken away, as claimed by the petitioners.