Goa inks MoU with Starlink to explore satellite internet for smart governance, disaster response
Wife of this billionaire buys MF Hussain's painting for Rs 118 crore, details here
T20I World Cup 2026: BCB makes another request to ICC, asks for more time to talk to Bangladesh govt
Trump calls PM Modi 'fantastic leader,' says will have 'great deal' with India
DNA TV Show: India's hypersonic vision on Republic Day 2026 parade
Deepinder Goyal resigns as Zomato CEO: Know his net worth, Eternal Q3 profit and more
INDIA
Certain pharmaceutical companies did not cut down price of drugs despite a relaxation in excise duty, making a profit of Rs43 crore.
Certain pharmaceutical companies did not cut down price of drugs despite a relaxation in excise duty, making a profit of Rs43 crore. These firms also evaded service tax to the tune of Rs182.81 crore, a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has revealed.
In view of these violations, CAG has recommended amendment in the Drugs (Prices Control) Order,1995, Act to include penal provisions.
It has also recommended that excise and service tax returns be integrated to mitigate the risk of evasion of duties/tax.
The government has agreed to address the issue while introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
For now, drug manufacturers should be compulsorily asked to declare on their excise returns, whether they had provided output services or received any service from foreign service providers, CAG said.
The public accounts watchdog said during the scrutiny of records it was found that certain manufacturers in Pune, Indore and Mumbai were producing and clearing bulk drugs specified in the first schedule of the Drugs Price Control Order but exceeded the Maximum Allowable Post-manufacturing Expenses (MAPE) by 100%.
It was also found that the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) had not specified the maximum retail price (MRP) at which the bulk drugs would be sold, which left the consumers paying up more, adding Rs23.53 to the manufacturer’s kitty.
The NPPA had agreed in February to recover the amount from M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. Action taken on the other two firms had not been intimated till March end.
There were two other cases where the NPPA had fixed the ceiling price of certain bulk drugs but the manufacturers charged higher prices from the consumers.