Samantha’s cosy picture with Raj Nidimoru sparks dating speculations, fans wonder what’s brewing
ICC makes first significant move to mediate BCCI vs Mohsin Naqvi Asia Cup trophy dispute
DNA TV Show: Analysis of row over 'Vande Mataram' as national song completes 150 years
Over 800 flights delayed, 20 cancelled at Delhi Airport after Air Traffic Control glitch
INDIA
Earlier this week, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and a bench of Justices NV Ramana, R Subhash Reddy, and BR Gavai had recused themselves.
Gautam Navlakha case fails to get a hearing for the third time in Supreme Court. Days after Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi and three other judges recused themselves from hearing a petition filed by activist Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon case, another judge on Thursday dogged the case.
A bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S Ravindra Bhat refused to hear the case as Justice Bhat recused himself from hearing Navlakha's plea seeking quashing of an FIR registered against him in the case. The matter is expected to be heard tomorrow.
Earlier this week, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and a bench of Justices NV Ramana, R Subhash Reddy, and BR Gavai had recused themselves.
Navlakha had filed an appeal challenging Bombay High Court's judgment which had refused to quash the FIR.
The matter had come up before a bench of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Ravindra Bhat today.
Senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Nitya Ramakrishna, appearing for Navlakha, told the court that interim protection from arrest granted to their client by Bombay High Court is slated to expire tomorrow.
Navlakha was booked under provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including waging a war and sedition. He is accused of having links with banned Naxal groups.
By its recent judgment, the High Court had arrived at the prima facie conclusion that there is sufficient material for the investigation to continue against Navlakha.
The High Court had, however, said that the observations made in its order are only prima facie in nature and that they should not influence the trial court's decision in the matter.
The High Court had also extended the interim protection from arrest given to Navlakha giving time to him to approach the Supreme Court.
The Maharashtra government has also filed a caveat petition in the matter seeking to be heard before any orders are passed by the apex court.
(With ANI inputs)