DNA TV Show: Who is the main culprit behind Delhi's air pollution?
Jammu and Kashmir: Cop killed in encounter with terrorists in Udhampur district
Pahalgam terror attack case: Pak handler Sajid Jatt among 7 named in NIA chargesheet; details inside
Pakistan Super League to clash with Indian Premier League again in 2026, set to commence on...
This Congress MP once claimed Lionel Messi was 'born in Assam'; know what exactly happened
WATCH: Crowd at Delhi's Arun Jaitley Stadium chants 'AQI' as CM Rekha Gupta meets Lionel Messi
CRICKET
In this exclusive chat with G Krishnan, the 63-year-old Jamaican speaks about the World Cup and his semifinalists.
Former West Indies wicketkeeping great Jeffrey Dujon says the India wicketkeeper is an asset to any team. In this exclusive chat with G Krishnan, the 63-year-old Jamaican speaks about the World Cup and his semifinalists. Excerpts:
On the basis of recent results, it is difficult to see the West Indies being a serious factor in the upcoming World Cup. Their recent losses to Bangladesh, who I do not see as a contender, suggest that they will have to make drastic improvements in all departments in order to compete with the favoured teams.
Chris Gayle is a tremendous limited-overs batsman. Regardless of his age, he is still capable of taking bowling attacks apart. He will be heavily depended on to bat at least into the middle overs in order to ensure a good start for the team. I am not of the opinion that anyone is afraid to bowl at him. Bowlers know what they are in for if he gets set and different strategies will be employed. I would not be surprised at seeing more seamers bowling length with pace variations around the wicket to him. I am hoping he stays fit and is able to go out on a high note. He deserves that.

(Dujon wants West Indies batsman Chris Gayle to go on a high)
Significant contributions are clearly required from the younger members of the team, not just for Chris Gayle, but for the future of West Indies cricket. They will definitely have to step up with both bat and ball.
All-rounders are essential to team balance. I see Andre Russell as a key man in the batting order. With the brittle nature of the West Indian middle order, he may be required for more than his big hitting. He must realise that he may come in at times when the innings needs to be re-established, and stay to finish it off. With the abundance of T20 cricket these days, average ODI scores have gone up. This is due to teams employing power hitting earlier in their innings. This will be a common feature in the World Cup.
I think England have a very good chance in this World Cup. The fact that they are playing at home is obviously an advantage, and their recent results show that they are playing at a high level.
Jofra Archer is clearly a talented bowler. He has proved himself to be a match winner and the England and Wales Cricket Board must see him as a complement to overall team balance.
My four semifinalists are: India – Best team in the world; England – Playing at home and highly ranked; Australia – Good balance with strong bowling; and South Africa – Good bowling but suspect batting or Pakistan – Good balance but unpredictable.
You have answered the question yourself!
MS Dhoni would be an asset to any team, not just for his outstandingly reliable wicketkeeping. His experience and calmness in difficult situations has been an asset to India for many years. Any captain would benefit from his presence on the field.

I don't see anything unique about the pitches. The bowlers have got to adapt to the conditions quickly and be tactical. I don't think wickets will be flat. And with the English weather, there will be something for the bowlers.
Having 10 teams makes far more sensible. The standard of cricket today is such that it is not worth the expense of two extra teams. Having teams to qualify for the World Cup makes sense and this number is sufficient. We really have 9-10 good teams in world cricket. We don't need to sort of add any cannon fodder. They should qualify to get there.