IND vs ENG 3rd Test Dream11 Predictions: Best picks of fantasy Playing XI for Lord's game
Delhi-NCR Earthquake: Tremors felt in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram
Gurugram police install ANPR cameras to tackle overspeeding on THIS expressway
Guru Purnima 2025: Top heartfelt wishes, WhatsApp messages, quotes, greetings to share on July 10
FIR filed against singer Yasser Desai for violating public safety norms, details inside
China allows THESE countries visa-free entry for…, reason is…
Dubai firm apologizes after UAE denies Golden Visa rumors; Authorities clarify application process
'Jo unhone sikhaaya...': Rishabh Pant's hilarious reason for stump-mic chatter goes viral
DNA TV Show: Why is there a row over Bihar voter list revision?
Who is Linda Yaccarino, CEO of Elon Musk's X, steps down after two years?
Meet actress who starred in Rs 475 crore film, then gave four flops, is now making OTT debut with...
Shubman Gill's viral photo with Sara Tendulkar at star-studded London event sets social media abuzz
SHOCKING statement by Pakistan months after Operation Sindoor, says, ‘India’s leadership…’
Billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance delays Jio Platforms IPO beyond 2025, listing pushed back to...
This company becomes world's first to hit USD 4 trillion market cap, not Apple, Microsoft, Google
BIG relief for Anil Ambani's Reliance Power subsidiary company, Delhi HC restrains...
Good news for Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli fans; BCCI plans ODI series against Sri Lanka – Date INSIDE!
Delhi govt cancels Rs 60 lakh tender for CM Rekha Gupta's residence renovation due to...
Have you changed jobs? Transfer online PF balance to new employer's account using THESE steps...
Ratan Tata’s aide Shantanu Naidu's BIG win, named ‘Social Impact Leader of 2025’ at...
Donald Trump THREATENS to bomb Moscow, Beijing in leaked audio recordings, says, 'I have...'
Rajkummar Rao, Patralekhaa announce pregnancy after 3 years of marriage: 'Baby on the way'
Jofra Archer returns after 4 years as England announce playing XI for 3rd Test against India
Why is IAF only air force to operate Jaguar? ALL about the fighter jet
Bad news for Byju Raveendran as US court holds him in contempt for...
Reliance Jio IPO: Mukesh Ambani delays launch of India's most anticipated stock due to...
THIS was deadliest bridge collapse in modern history, major incidents killing thousands of people...
Who is Monika Kapoor? Woman extradited from US by CBI after 26 years, she is charged with…
How were 141 people killed in Morbi? Earlier incidents of bridge collapse in Gujarat
IAF's Jaguar fighter jet crashes in Rajasthan's Churu, here's what we know so far
BUSINESS
Nestle also prayed for setting aside the impugned order of Commissioner of Food Safety, Government of Maharashtra, banning the production and sale of 'Maggi' products of the company in the State.
Multinational Giant Nestle India Ltd today challenged in the Mumbai High Court the orders of food authorities banning nine variants of its instant product "Maggi" from the Indian market for being "hazardous" to public health and the plea will be heard on Friday.
The revision application (appeal against the impugned orders passed by authorities in Delhi and Maharashtra) was mentioned orally by the company's counsel before a division bench of Justice V M Kanade and B P Colabawalla which posted it for hearing on Friday.
The lawyer urged the court to hear the matter urgently as the company had suffered losses due to the food regulator's orders which had asked Nestle India Ltd to withdraw and recall the products from the market with immediate effect after finding that they were "hazardous to public health due to presence of lead more than the permissible limits".
Nestle urged the HC to quash the June 5 order of Delhi-based Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and its Chief Executive Officer asking the company to withdraw and recall all its nine variants of Maggi from the market as they were unsafe and hazardous for human consumption.
The impugned orders also asked the company to stop production, processing, import, distribution and sale of their products with immediate effect, said Nestle.
Nestle also prayed for setting aside the impugned order of Commissioner of Food Safety, Government of Maharashtra, banning the production and sale of 'Maggi' products of the company in the State.
The company said the impugned orders do not comply with the mandatory provisions of section 34 of Food Safety and Standards Authority Act which deals with Emergency prohibition notices and orders. It said the orders were passed without any authority and without following due process of law.
The company also said the impugned orders were illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of Natural Justice as well as the Constitution of India.
Nestle argued that the application of standards or tolerance limit by the authorities in the tests conducted by them for the presence of lead in its products was "incorrect and against the law."
The finding of the impugned order that the cake and tastemaker should be tested separately are "erroneous and liable to be set aside," it said.
It argued that there has been no misbranding or violation of packaging and labelling regulations as alleged by the impugned orders.
The directions in impugned orders to withdraw and recall its product "Maggi Masala Oats" was arbitrary and devoid of merits. Nestle denied that its products posed a health risk as alleged by the impugned orders, the company said.
It said, on August 27, 2014, the company had applied to Food Safety and Standards Authority of India for product approval of 'Maggi Masala Oats.' On February 20, 2015, FSSAI had asked certain clarifications from the company and Nestle India, which were answered on March 24.
On June 5, the order was passed by FSSAI against the company asking it to withdraw products on the ground that they were harmful to public health. The very next day, Maharashtra passed an order prohibited sale of Maggi variants in the State.
Nestle contended that it had on its own conducted tests of their products since October 2014 and found them to be of a standard quality. It annexed copies of the tests to its appeal.
The company denied allegations of food authorities in India of the presence of lead in excess of permissible levels of 2.5 parts per million (ppm) and refuted charges that the information given on labels and package of its products were "misleading".
Nestle further said that the allegation of lead presence in its products was "non-specific and vague" as it did not say how the product was misbranded.