Goa inks MoU with Starlink to explore satellite internet for smart governance, disaster response
Wife of this billionaire buys MF Hussain's painting for Rs 118 crore, details here
T20I World Cup 2026: BCB makes another request to ICC, asks for more time to talk to Bangladesh govt
Trump calls PM Modi 'fantastic leader,' says will have 'great deal' with India
DNA TV Show: India's hypersonic vision on Republic Day 2026 parade
Deepinder Goyal resigns as Zomato CEO: Know his net worth, Eternal Q3 profit and more
BUSINESS
China’s eagerly anticipated “hard landing” hasn’t happened yet, and recent indicators make me wonder if it ever will. In the past two months, the Chinese economy has actually shown signs of accelerating.
Constant pessimism in financial markets about the country’s prospects is only partly guided by economic analysis. There’s also the faith-based view that growth as rapid as China’s simply can’t go on — and that a non-democratic country really shouldn’t expect to prosper.
By the end of this year, China’s gross domestic product will be roughly $9 trillion, making its economy comfortably more than half the size of the US, and half as big again as Japan.
China’s economy is already more than three times the size of France or the UK, and half as big again as Brazil, Russia and India combined. Of the four BRIC countries, China is the only one to have exceeded my expectations. The other three have done less well than I’d hoped.
China is in effect creating another India every two years — making a mockery of those who’ve argued that India’s democratic model is more likely to deliver long-term economic success.
China is already more than four times bigger than its southern neighbour. India’s economy won’t rival China’s for a very long time, if ever.
With GDP growth of 7.5%, inflation running about 3%, and a currency that’s rising gently against the dollar, China is adding about $1 trillion a year to global GDP, easily boosting its share of the total.
For many analysts, none of this is enough. According to a popular refrain, China might have staved off disaster in 2013 and papered over the cracks yet again in the short term – but next year, the crunch will come.
Supporting this notion is a question I’m asked all the time: If China’s doing so well, how come everyone always loses money investing there? Let me explore both issues a bit further.
It isn’t clear to me why China’s economy must deteriorate next year. China’s slowdown to its current 7.5% growth rate was well signposted by a sharp slowdown in leading indicators. Those measures, including monetary growth and electricity usage, are no longer flashing red. Coincident indicators such as the monthly purchasing managers’ index have picked up. Unless you believe that China is somehow doomed to fail, these signs are encouraging. They suggest that the rest of this year and the first part of 2014 might see slightly stronger growth.
The more resourceful pessimists next argue that the better growth signals are coming from parts of the economy where growth is unsustainable — such as the urban housing market and government-directed investment — from excessive growth of credit extended by shadow banks, and not from a broadly based expansion of consumer spending. If this were clearly the case, I’d be a pessimist, too, because a buoyant China needs consumers to take the lead.
Data for monthly retail sales suggest that consumption has held up well despite the fall in the trend of industrial production. I closely follow the trend of retail sales, adjusted for inflation and relative to the trend of industrial production, and though not moving in a straight line, this indicator has been generally rising for three years.
This is a pretty good sign that the rebalancing China needs is happening.
Another is the decline in the current-account surplus to about 3% of GDP.
Reducing the external surplus from more than 10% of GDP before 2008 to about 3% now -- while limiting the fall in growth from 10% to about 7.5% — is quite an achievement.
In my view, the “unsustainable” component of China’s economic prospects was the current-account surplus, not the growth rate, and the needed adjustment in the surplus has been achieved.
Dragon flies
Coincident indicators such as the monthly purchasing managers’ index have picked up, which is an encouraging sign.
They suggest that the rest of this year and the first part of 2014 might see slightly stronger growth.
Monthly retail sales data that consumption has held up well despite the fall in production.
O’Neill is former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management