Twitter
Advertisement

UN expert denies endorsing 9/11 'conspiracy theory'

A UN expert on Palestinian human rights on Friday denied supporting the idea that the US government was behind the September 11 attacks and accused a 'pro-Israel group' of distorting his words.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

A UN expert on Palestinian human rights on Friday denied supporting the idea that the US government was behind the September 11 attacks and accused a "pro-Israel group" of distorting his words.

US academic Richard Falk wrote in a blog this month that there had been an "apparent cover-up" by US authorities over the September 11, 2001, attacks, in which hijackers flew airliners into the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon near Washington, killing more than 3,000 people.

Falk's blog was condemned by UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, and US ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice said Falk should be fired from his position as the UN Human Rights Council's special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories.

"I wish to be absolutely clear," Falk said in a statement. "I do not endorse the theory that the US government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks."

"What I did do, in my personal blog ... was argue that investigations must be, and must be seen to be, transparent, exhaustive and honest," he said, adding that he did not intend to show disrespect for the victims of the September 11 attacks.

Falk blamed UN Watch, a Geneva-based advocacy group affiliated with the American Jewish Committee, for igniting the controversy. The group was the first to report on Falk's blog and called on Ban to "strongly condemn Mr Falk's offensive remarks -- and ... immediately remove him from his post."

"The pro-Israel group, UN Watch, that created this mess deliberately distorted comments I made, in my personal capacity, on my blog," Falk said.

UN Watch frequently criticizes the Human Rights Council, saying it often berates Israel while ignoring rights violations by developing countries. It has targeted Falk in the past.

But Falk's January 11 blog post unequivocally refers to a cover-up regarding the events of September 11, 2001.

"What may be more distressing than the apparent cover up is the eerie silence of the mainstream media, unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al-Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials," Falk wrote.

Ban's chief of staff Vijay Nambiar said on Monday that it was not up to Ban to fire Falk, since he was appointed by the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, a 47-nation body created by the UN General Assembly in 2006.

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement