Twitter
Advertisement

After critical Donald Trump's tweet, Mark Zuckerberg defends Facebook's role in the US election

Rejecting US President Donald Trump's criticisms, Facebook Inc's CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday said both Trump and liberals were upset about ideas and content on Facebook during the campaign.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

Rejecting US President Donald Trump's criticisms, Facebook Inc's CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday said both Trump and liberals were upset about ideas and content on Facebook during the campaign.

On Wednesday, Trump's tweet criticized Facebook as 'anti-Trump' and suggested the company could have colluded with other media outlets that opposed him. 

In a Facebook post, Zuckerberg noted that the 2016 campaign was the first in the United States where the internet was a primary way candidates communicated and said the ability of candidates and voters to interact was a good thing.

He also pointed to 'get out the vote' efforts that had spurred almost 2 million people to register to vote.

Zuckerberg also said he regretted saying after the election that it was 'crazy' to think that misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election, adding that the comment was 'dismissive.'

Facebook is part of investigations both houses of Congress and special counsel Robert Mueller are conducting into Russian influence in the 2016 election.

Here's what Zuckerberg said in a Facebook post

I want to respond to President Trump's tweet this morning claiming Facebook has always been against him.

Every day I work to bring people together and build a community for everyone. We hope to give all people a voice and create a platform for all ideas.

Trump says Facebook is against him. Liberals say we helped Trump. Both sides are upset about ideas and content they don't like. That's what running a platform for all ideas looks like.

The facts suggest the greatest role Facebook played in the 2016 election was different from what most are saying:

► More people had a voice in this election than ever before. There were billions of interactions discussing the issues that may have never happened offline. Every topic was discussed, not just what the media covered.

► This was the first US election where the internet was a primary way candidate communicated. Every candidate had a Facebook page to communicate directly with tens of millions of followers every day.

► Campaigns spent hundreds of millions advertising online to get their messages out even further. That's 1000x more than any problematic ads we've found.

► We ran "get out the vote" efforts that helped as many as 2 million people register to vote. To put that in perspective, that's bigger than the get out the vote efforts of the Trump and Clinton campaigns put together. That's a big deal.

► After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea. Calling that crazy was dismissive and I regret it. This is too important an issue to be dismissive. But the data we have has always shown that our broader impact -- from giving people a voice to enabling candidates to communicate directly to helping millions of people vote -- played a far bigger role in this election.

► We will continue to work to build a community for all people. We will do our part to defend against nation states attempting to spread misinformation and subvert elections. We'll keep working to ensure the integrity of free and fair elections around the world, and to ensure our community is a platform for all ideas and force for good in a democracy.

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement