The United States of America has had a history of abetting anti-national elements in other countries to suit their own interests.
Twenty years later, according to top official sources in the Indian government, mounting evidence suggests that David Coleman Headley is a double agent of the CIA and the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). FBI investigators have told India that Headley doesn't want to be questioned by Indian investigators, increasing suspicions that he is a 'double agent'.
Despite knowing about Headley's links with the LeT, one year before the Mumbai terror attacks, the CIA never informed Indian authorities when he was freely traveling through India.
What could be the FBI's motive behind revealing Headley's identity at this juncture in the course of the investigation? What could the CIA possibly gain by withholding such vital information from India?
Comments