Australia's cricketers union urged a swift resolution to a damaging pay dispute today to avoid any strike disruption to this year's Ashes
The ongoing pay dispute might leave Australia without their top players in the home Ashes series against England later this year, vice-captain David Warner has warned.
Australian Cricketers' Association (ACA) rejected Cricket Australia's (CA) pay offer last month, dismissing the proposal as "a win for cricket administrators but a loss for cricket".
CA has threatened the players with unemployment, saying they would not get alternative contracts if they fail to agree to the new collective bargaining agreement.
Warner said he and his colleague would not "buckle at all".
"If it gets to the extreme they might not have a team for the Ashes," Warner told the Age newspaper.
"I really hope they can come to an agreement... we don't really want to see this panning out like that where we don't have a team, we don't have cricket in the Australian summer.
"It is up to CA to deal with the ACA. It's obviously in their hands," said the 30-year-old.
Fast-bowling team mate Mitchell Starc had earlier predicted "an interesting men's and women's ashes" in a cryptic tweet, triggering speculations of a possible players' strike if they were not paid after the existing collective bargaining agreement expires on June 30.
Warner said the players were not really shocked by the CA stance.
"We thought something along the lines of this might happen ... it's not come as a shock, but more the fact it has come so early," the opener said.
"We won't buckle at all, we are standing together and very strong, and as you can see from all the people that have spoken so far, we are all on the same wavelength,” he said.
Earlier, Cricket Australia last week threatened not to pay contracted players beyond the June 30 expiry of their current financial deal if they didn't accept a new offer.
The robust statement prompted warnings of a strike, with pace spearhead Mitchell Starc tweeting: "Makes for an interesting men's and women's ashes..."
Former Test all-rounder Shane Watson added his support by tweeting: "Well said @mstarc56. It will be an interesting game of cricket without any players."
Alistair Nicholson, chief executive of the Australian Cricketers' Association, said players wanted the dispute resolved rather than risk damaging the showpiece Ashes series against England, starting in November.
"It is in our interest to get this done. The players want it done," he told Melbourne radio Monday.
"They don't want to be in a dispute. They want to play the Ashes and we now need to get around to mediation and get this done. We've come up with a solution that's a win-win and that was rejected by Cricket Australia within two hours." The dispute centres on Cricket Australia's desire to scrap the fixed percentage players have earned since the first memorandum of understanding was agreed 20 years ago.
Following Cricket Australia's ultimatum, Nicholson said he had been contacted by several players.
"The response from the players was quite swift to me, being clear what they thought about it," he said.
"Basically, they're continuing to support our position and our calls for mediation are now even more important, based on that letter.
"It was obviously a really big threat to the player group and hence we've called for mediation."
CA chief executive James Sutherland has accused the ACA of having "unfairly placed current players in a difficult position".
"As it stands, (the revenue share model) has achieved its purpose -- to make Australia's male cricketers among the best paid sportspeople in the country -- but it needs to be adjusted, not least to ensure our women receive proper remuneration," said Sutherland.
"Under our proposal, we can achieve this while still lifting payments for our male cricketers."
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
 "Australia")
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
)
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
)
)
)
)
)
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}