Home > Sport > Comment

Dravid's exclusion a graceless act

Ayaz Memon
Friday, October 16, 2009 2:46 IST
Email Email
Print Print
Share Share
Ayaz Memon
Syndicate
this column

Rahul Dravid would be justified in feeling used and abused. Brought in a few weeks back to shore up the suspect Indian batting against short-pitched bowling, he finds himself bowled neck and crop by a grubber, as it were, and this one bowled by the selectors themselves.

With Gautam Gambhir, Virender Sehwag and Yuvraj Singh available, there was always going to be a jostling for space in the batting line-up. These three, along with Tendulkar, select themselves in the playing eleven, and with skipper Dhoni to follow, the scope for a batsman like Dravid at number six is admittedly reduced. But should he have been summarily axed at this point in time? And so unceremoniously, as to belittle a great batsman whose contribution to Indian cricket is immense?

Having been dumped more than 18 months ago, Dravid's surprise return to the side suggested some panic in the cricket establishment after the disaster in the Twenty20 World Championship. But if he was not seen good enough to last till the 2011 World Cup, this recall was a short-sighted attempt at quelling a crisis, rather than resolving it permanently.

Frankly, not much has changed in the past few weeks where Indian cricket is concerned: the batting still looks suspect, and after a poor performance in the Champions Trophy, there is the need for the team to redeem itself in the forthcoming series against Australia, which boasts a terrific pace attack.

Even though the seven-match series is being played on friendlier home wickets than those that were available in South Africa, Australia's potent pace attack poses the biggest threat, and Dravid's presence in the squad would have been of psychological value -- if not in the middle itself.

In the few opportunities he has got since his recall, Dravid has looked to be in reasonable form and scored runs at a fair clip. Moreover, none of the Indian batsmen have done anything spectacular in the preceding few months, so the arguments against Dravid -- barring his age -- would ring shallow.

Evidently, the cricket establishment is looking to build a team (and support staff) for the 2011 World Cup, which explains the mini-purge that took place on Thursday. But while the ouster of coaches Venkatesh Prasad and Robin Singh can be ascribed to India's poor bowling and fielding form in recent tournaments, Dravid's sacking is less easily explained; the graceless manner in which it was done, even more so.

Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article.
For reprint rights click here
digg reddit google Facebook MySpace delicious

Post your comment

Readers' comments:
Sure it is graceless, but that is not the point. The selectors chose him for South Africa because the pitches and team composition (due to lack of Sehwag and later Yuvraj) made it a sensible pick. With a series against Australia on Indian pitches with the 3 returning to fitness it makes little sense to pick Dravid. Selectors are trying to pick the team which they feel will win. Same logic as in the Champions trophy, different picks. If it makes sense to pick him again, I'm sure the selectors will do so. Dravid's service to Indian cricket is neither here nor there.
Monday, October 19, 2009 6:32 IST
Nitin, Toronto
The week that was: November 15 - November 21, 2009
Here are the top national and international stories from the past week
Mumbai mindset
Ritam Banerjee exhibited his perception of Mumbai city during the opening of his photography exhibition Mumbai: The City That Talks to Me.

Get daily news in your inbox and read it at your convenience.

D