Mob violence is considered an inherent ingredient of any megacity all over the world Mumbai is no exception to the problem. In a situation, where people jostle for elbow space all the time, even a small incident incites a mob to participate in violence.
Under extraordinary circumstances, mere bystanders become participants and indulge in violence. Mobs first surfaced during the late ‘60s when trade unions were ruling the roost in Mumbai and the newly-formed Shiv Sena was trying to find its roots.
Display of muscle power and a show of strength could only be exhibited through the numerical superiority of people present at the scene of the protest. The first goal for the Shiv Sainiks was to wean away the lumpen elements from the left-leaning trade unions.
Overawing them by aggressive display of mob violence was the easiest way. Hundreds of Sainiks would attack the trade union offices, ransack them and indulge in frequent violence.
Later natives from South India were at the receiving end of violence in the ‘70s, by marauding local mobs. Even smaller agitations against ration shop owners, kerosene suppliers or shopkeepers used to be led by mobs rather than individuals.
Over the years, the practice became more visible during the agitation for Marathi signboards or attacks against North Indians. Whether it is ransacking of newspaper office, television or production houses, it is always pursued by a mob which takes more delight than remorse at the senseless damage caused. Mumbai has learnt to live with the mob.
Comments