Stone Age temple found in Orkney 'much older than Stonehenge'

Tuesday, 3 January 2012 - 9:36pm IST | Place: London | Agency: ANI

So far the remains of 14 Stone Age buildings have been excavated.

Archaeologists have discovered a Stone Age temple in Orkney, which is 800 years older than Stonehenge, and contains Britain’s earliest known wall paintings.

The site, known as the Ness of Brodgar, was investigated by BBC2 documentary ‘A History of Ancient Britain’, with presenter Neil Oliver describing it as ‘the discovery of a lifetime’.

So far the remains of 14 Stone Age buildings have been excavated, but thermal geophysics technology has revealed that there are 100 altogether, forming a kind of temple precinct.

The new Orkney site may take the title from Stonehenge, which was considered to have been the centre of Neolithic culture until now.

“The excavation of a vast network of buildings on Orkney is allowing us to recreate an entire Stone Age world,” the Daily Mail quoted Oliver as saying.

“It’s opening a window onto the mysteries of Neolithic religion,” he stated.

Experts believe that the site will give us insights into what Neolithic people believed about the world and the universe.

“It’s an archaeologist’s dream site. The excitement of the site never fades. This site is a one-off,” said Nick Card, an archaeologist from the University of the Highlands and Islands.

Professor Mark Edmonds from the University of York, meanwhile, describes the excavation as “a site of international importance.”

Some parts of the temple are 800 years older than Stonehenge, which lies 500 miles to the south in Wiltshire.

The site is very close to the Ring of Brodgar stone circle and the standing stones of Stenness and is surrounded by a wall believed to have been 10-feet high.

Archaeologists found red zigzag lines on some of the buildings’ inner walls that they believe is Stone Age art—the oldest ever found.

So far only around 10% of the site has been examined, and it could take decades to uncover and analyse everything there.

Jump to comments

Recommended Content