Twitter
Advertisement

Haneef's lawyers not given sensitive documents

Lawyers appearing for Mohamed Haneef in a government appeal against a judge's decision to reinstate his visa, have not been given access to sensitive documents.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

MELBOURNE: Lawyers appearing for Indian doctor Mohamed Haneef in a government appeal against a judge's decision to reinstate his visa, have not been given access to sensitive documents concerning the Immigration Department's handling of the issue.

There were arguments in the Federal Court that Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews is 'straining credulity' with his public position on the case, 'The Australian' reported on Friday.

The nine-page document's existence was revealed on Thursday after a Freedom of Information officer for the Immigration Department advised Haneef's lawyers that only the title, 'Draft Action Plan', would be released.

The decision to deny any access to the document was challenged by Haneef's lawyers in a written submission to the Full Court of the Federal Court, which is hearing an appeal by Andrews over the stripping of the one-time terror suspect's work visa.

Chief Justice Michael Black, Justice Robert French and Justice Mark Weinberg have been asked to order the document be handed over by the legal team for Andrews, who has been criticised for his handling of the case.
   
Andrews became embroiled in the case when he cancelled Haneef's visa on July 16, hours after a Brisbane magistrate had granted him bail on grounds that included the weakness of a terrorism case brought by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Commonwealth DPP.

Andrews has repeatedly denied that his visa cancellation decision on the afternoon of July 16 was an attempt to thwart the criminal justice system and he rejects suggestions that he knew of any contingency plan to keep Haneef in custody if he were granted bail.

The disclosure under freedom of information laws (FOI) in classified emails, published in The Australian this month and showing how top AFP officers were aware on July 14 of a contingency plan with the Immigration Department to keep Dr Haneef in custody by relying on the Migration Act, has raised suspicions of a plan implicating Mr Andrews and his top staff.

The folio sequence of FOI documents identified by the Immigration Department's officer indicates the "Draft Action Plan" was created shortly before the Australian Federal Police email about the "contingency" strategy, which was copied to Peter White, the senior public servant who was advising Andrews on the visa cancellation.

The email was written by AFP's David Craig and the recipients included the agency's counter-terrorism chief, Assistant Commissioner Frank Prendergast.

The Federal Court in Brisbane was told yesterday in written submissions from Haneef's legal team, led by Stephen Keim SC, that "it is hard to imagine" the contingency plan could have been put in place without the knowledge of Andrews and his ministerial staff.

The court was told that the emails 'are cogent evidence' that the purpose of Andrews in cancelling the visa was to have Haneef detained indefinitely "in order to overturn the impact of the successful bail application".

Haneef's lawyers argued it "strains credulity" that the purpose of police was not communicated to Andrews as "any alternative conclusion would constitute a conspiracy by the AFP to delude a minister to exercise his powers for an ulterior purpose.

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
    Advertisement

    Live tv

    Advertisement
    Advertisement