Twitter
Advertisement

Experts question #SwachhSurvekshan2017 results

Former Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation official Seema Redkar said that she didn't agree with the way the study was conducted.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

Several waste management experts have questioned the methodology employed by the Swachh Survekshan 2017 to determine the cleanest cities in India.

Former Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation official Seema Redkar said that she didn't agree with the way the study was conducted. "It is unfair to compare a city like Indore to Mumbai. Indore has one municipal corporation, but Mumbai has several bodies such as the BMC, MMRDA, SRA and the MHADA operating the city. Yet, despite this, Mumbai, while having a 55 per cent slum population, has done a good job," she said.

While smaller cities need to function using a decentralised model, there needs to be municipal intervention in larger cities. "Having said that, the citizens need to be more proactive when it comes to waste segregation," she added.

Last Thursday, Urban Development Minister Venkaiah Naidu released the Swachh Surveksha 2017 report in New Delhi. Indore in Madhya Pradesh topped the list of cleanest cities. This was followed by Bhopal and Vishakhapatnam, while Surat and Mysore also made it to the top 5 cleanest cities, according to the government cleanliness ranking.

The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in New Delhi justified the positioning of Mysore. However, Swati Singh Sambyal, a waste management expert with the organisation told DNA that Indore and Bhopal topping the list doesn't make sense. "While there is engagement between the community and the municipality, all the garbage is taken away from the city and dumped. There is no waste management as such," she said.

In fact, in a press release, CSE said, "The cities are focussing on collection of unsegregated waste and transporting it to landfills, with a very minimal quantum of waste being processed. The top three cities are dumping unsegregated waste. These cities are, therefore, not meeting the statutory requirements of the Municipal Solid Waste Rules (MSW Rules), 2016."

Citing the examples of Alappuzha in Kerala and Panaji in Goa, Sambyal said that both these cities, along with Mysore have employed a model where garbage segregation is decentralised. This means that locals are involved in the collection and segregation of garbage. "The wet waste is used as compost, while the dry garbage is collected by authorities once a week and used to recycle. In fact, the model in Panaji is such that people know where to send 30 items for recycling," she said.

Sambyal added that local involvement has saved the municipal authorities lakhs of rupees, which should have also been taken into consideration while scoring the cities. "If we would take the cities that have implemented a decentralised model, and understood the importance of local involvement in waste management, then Alappuzha, Panaji, Surat, Mysore, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) and Suryapet (Telangana). Ambikapur and Suryapet came 15 and 30 respectively in the government ranking, Panaji was 90, and Alappuzha was ranked 380.

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement