Twitter
Advertisement

Bombay High Court says judge had no authority to warn registry staff

In an important order, the Bombay high court on Friday recalled its own order where another judge had ordered disciplinary action against the court's registry staff.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

In an important order, the Bombay high court on Friday recalled its own order where another judge had ordered disciplinary action against the court's registry staff.

A full bench comprising three judges - chief justice Mohit Shah and justices PV Hardas and VK Tahilramani - recalled the order directing that action be initiated against the court's registry staff.

A division bench headed by justice SC Dharmadhikari, on January 28, had directed that disciplinary action should be initiated against the court's registry staff for failing to place an affidavit before the court when the matter came up for hearing.

The division bench had directed that there be a warning, and noting in confidential reports of the registry staff, saying, "We have noticed that the registry has not placed the affidavit, which is stated to have been filed on January 20, 2015, in the original files. This is happening in most of the matters. The paper books circulated at our residence and in court are without the said affidavits. This has inconvenienced us and the litigants as well."

While recalling the order, the full bench observed: "As per settled legal position and constitutional scheme, learned judge in division bench could not have issued warning to the concerned staff, including noting in confidential report."

The full bench further said that they were not saying that there was no lapse on the part the staff. "This is not to say that absence of diligence or lapse on part of the staff is not to be regularized, the question is about competence of any other judge/court to initiate disciplinary action," observed the full bench, adding that, "The learned judge who passed the order (of disciplinary action) did not have such powers."

While recalling the concerned paragraphs of the January 28 order, the full bench has now asked the prothonotary and senior master of HC to place the matter before the chief justice for appropriate orders.

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement