
So the October 2 ban is a triumph, however small, of reason and reasonableness. But Ramadoss will have to engage in and win more debilitating skirmishes to justify India?s position as a signatory to the World Health Organisation?s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.
Under the framework, the country will have to display pictorial warnings on tobacco packs by the end of this year. But I don?t see that happening smoothly: 45 cases have been filed against graphic health warnings on tobacco packs, 28 of them in Tamil Nadu.
The tobacco lobby is unnaturally big-muscled in India; although it is pretty powerful in rich countries too, its bullying capacity is not abrasive enough to scrap pictorial warnings. Those of you who follow US presidential campaigns will remember how Bob Dole, one of the Republican hopefuls in 1988, suffered a crushing setback when he casually remarked: ?Smoking is not necessarily addictive?. A warning put up on the Marlboro pack 20 years later emphatically contradicts him!
According to one estimate, one million Indians die every year from tobacco-related diseases, other enumerators think the figure could be much higher.
It is clear that Ramadoss needs citizens? help to curb smoking. Mumbai, the Mecca of Cool can take the lead in lending him a hand. Can one, just one, tony pub in the city ban smoking and thus let out a hint that smoking is uncool? Can one, just one, five-star property in the city eliminate all smoking rooms ? believe me, the occupancy will never be affected. Can one, just one, corporate castle in the city offer the free services of a counsellor and doctor to employees who want to give up smoking? If one, just one, of these things happen, Mumbai will be healthier than ever.
raghu@dnaindia.net
