Twitter
Advertisement

Taj Mansingh Hotel auction: SC orders status quo, issues notice to NDMC

The Delhi HC had earlier dismissed the Tata Group's appeal for retaining management rights over the hotel.

Latest News
article-main
Taj Mansingh Hotel
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

The Supreme Court on Monday ordered that the status quo with regard to the Taj Mansingh Hotel be maintained and issued a notice to the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to reply to a plea against the auction of hotel.

The next hearing will take place in January.

The Delhi High Court had earlier dismissed the Tata Group's appeal for retaining management rights over the Taj Mansingh Hotel, and in all practicality, told the business conglomerate that it will have to participate in the auction process.

The high court gave the green signal to the NDMC to go ahead with the public auction of the Taj Mansingh Hotel located in Central Delhi.

A bench of Justices Pradeep Nandrajog and Pratibha Rani had reserved the verdict on Indian Hotels Company Ltd's (IHCL) plea seeking to restrain the NDMC from auctioning the property.

On September 25, a single judge bench had dismissed the suit by the current operator, IHCL, to renew its license and upheld the NDMC's decision to go for the auction.

The next day the IHCL filed an appeal before a division bench against this order.

The property, owned by NDMC, was given to IHCL on a lease for 33 years, which ended in 2011. The IHCL has been managing the property since then through several extensions. The IHCL in 2013 filed a civil suit against the civic body in the Delhi High Court after it decided to auction the property.

The NDMC has entered into an agreement with the IHCL a subsidiary of Tata Sons Ltd, on 18 December 1976 to construct and run a five-star hotel in one of the prime locations in Central Delhi, Mansingh Road.

The hotel became functional on October 10, 1978. According to the IHCL, the original licence agreement with NDMC as the licensor and IHCL as the licencee-later became a joint venture with two equal partners. The high court rejected these claims. 

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement