Home > Money > Comment

Why the RIL bonus goes against the grain

R Jagannathan
Monday, October 12, 2009 2:17 IST
Email Email
Print Print
Share Share
R Jagannathan
Syndicate
this column
Normally, when a company issues bonus shares, it is a robust signal of optimism. The company is telling its investors: we think our earnings are growing fast enough to service the higher equity base.

However, the Ambanis have always been exceptions to the rule. From the time of Dhirubhai Ambani, they have never believed in gifting shares. This is why the flagship company, Reliance Industries, has always been stingy with bonuses, despite being immensely profitable most of the time.

In fact, the markets take a bonus issue from Reliance as a negative signal, as evidenced by the weak trend in Reliance shares even after the company announced its "Diwali gift".
Do the markets know a thing or two about Reliance that we don't?

One suspects they do. And this is what it could be. As a business philosophy, the Ambanis believe in regularly raising capital. There is a constant search for new money, cheap capital. This was, in fact, Dhirubhai's original business model -- and it continues to this day with his sons.


He believed that companies that want to grow must always have lots of cash, and this is why he constantly looked for ways to raise money, whether he had a project to fund or not. The cash comes first, the project later.

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Reliance invented one reason or the other to raise cash, and not all of it went into projects. First came a series of non-convertible debentures (NCDs) that everyone in the markets knew would finally be converted into shares at huge premiums. When it seemed as if Reliance could not possibly need more cash, Dhirubhai created new companies (Reliance Petrochem, Reliance Polypropylene and Reliance Polyethylene -- popularly called the ilu-pilu twins after a popular song in the 1990s).

The idea was obviously to rake in the cash before merging them back into Reliance.
Dhirubhai's success flows from the capital raising machine he created. As other commentators have noted before, Reliance is really two companies in one: a giant money churning machine, and a humdrum, vertically integrated oil-to-textiles business. The second is incidental to the Reliance success.

The formula could have worked in almost any other business had Dhirubhai cared to enter them. It's just that he happened to start with textiles and began integrating backward into petrochemicals, petroleum and oil exploration when he spotted business opportunities. He would have been even more successful as a banker.

Coming back to the bonus question, Dhirubhai never believed in them since it meant giving away capital rather than raising it. To be sure, he did acquiesce in some bonus issues -- most notably in 1997 -- under shareholder pressure, but his heart wasn't in it. His stock reply, when pressed for bonuses at annual general meetings, was that he believed in "mini bonuses" in the form of rights and other issues. He preferred to let shareholders invest in his companies rather than take the money away. He left shareholder rewards to the market.

His two sons have largely followed in his footsteps. This is one reason why Mukesh Ambani created another petroleum company to raise money when all along everyone knew that Reliance Petroleum would be merged back with Reliance at some point of time.
His brother Anil Ambani, too, raised money in Reliance Power when he could have done the same through Reliance Energy (now Reliance Infra). His Reliance Communications is offloading its towers into a new company, again to raise capital. Neither brother believes in bonuses, but Anil was forced to consider one in Reliance Power when the share price tanked soon after it was listed last year.

There is thus, good reason to believe that brother Mukesh's bonus issue last week in Reliance Industries is also a negative signal. To understand why, let's see what a bonus really is. It is a mere redesignation of capital. Most companies hold shareholders' funds in two parts -- equity capital, which is entitled to dividends, and reserves, which are not. A bonus issue shifts capital from non-dividend-earning ownership to dividend-earning, and usually leads to cash outflows.

This does nothing for the company itself. Bonuses are not even tax-efficient. A bonus share has zero purchase value, and hence if you sell them within a year, you have to pay short-term capital gains taxes at your marginal rate. So why did Mukesh Ambani announce a bonus issue? There are many theories, and I don't plan to examine them. But the signal is probably negative.

Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article.
For reprint rights click here
digg reddit google Facebook MySpace delicious

Post your comment

Readers' comments:
Enlightening article about the richest Indian Business family. One can't blame the Ambanis for the way they have adhered to raise capital over the years, however. It's just the sharp business acumen Ambanis have been endowed with. 'Bonus Issue' move is nothing but an accounting trick but then one can't refute the fact that it's 'house money' for retail investors. It's like a free lunch. Whether a bonus issue indicates any change in 'networth' or not is the least of their headaches.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:03 IST
Amitesh, Noida
A good article in the time that other business outlets are transforming into Business and Political Observer. RIL declares bonuses to overcome shareholder pessimism. The 1997 one came after the massive duplicate issues scam hit RIL. Jagan, you forgot that one?
Tuesday, October 13, 2009 15:34 IST
Shriman, Mumbai
Such type of stories smack of biased approach and poor research on an issue. What is this columnist's problem if RIL declares a bonus and dividend? If co doesn't declare a bonus these guys have an issue, if it does then also they have a problem. Can't understand why newspapers have to pay for such poor quality content.
Monday, October 12, 2009 21:05 IST
vijyant, indore
Totally half-hearted story. If you don't want to go to the root of the issue, don't create sensation. This creates doubts about your credibility.
Monday, October 12, 2009 13:54 IST
Sanjay, Vadodara
this is what is called "vighnasantusht". People who enjoy being negative. What is your problem if the hard-pressed investors make some money?
Monday, October 12, 2009 10:05 IST
rr, nayyar
More comments »
Dress me up
The preview of designers Shantanu and Nikhil's cocktail line of dresses hosted by Naseeb Kapoor and Sharmilla Khanna at Samsaara.
Adventurous women!
The Cosmopolitan Fun Fearless Female awards saw a galaxy of stars descend on the venue to be awarded in various categories.

Get daily news in your inbox and read it at your convenience.

C