Twitter
Advertisement

Leena Manimekalai: Broke but not broken

Chennai-based activist filmmaker Leena Manimekalai has been arrested, harassed, had her tapes seized and films banned, but she is unwilling to compromise on her radical approach to filmmaking.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

In a country where the closest we get to political filmmaking is, say, a love story set in the backdrop of communal violence, or a love story set in the backdrop of militancy in Kashmir, or well, a love story set in the backdrop of (fill in preferred social/political issue), the fiery, irrepressible Leena Manimekalai is an aberration. That the 33-year-old, though feted abroad, is a marginal figure in her own country, and is struggling to pay her cast and crew, is a testament to her own uncompromising vision of filmmaking as a political act. And it helps that she is never afraid to pay the price for her politics. “I know the importance of being hated,” she says.

shooting for justice
Cut to 2002. Manimekalai lands up in Mangattucheri village near Arokonam. With a hired vehicle, camera equipment, and the Rs 1 lakh she had saved up, she set out to make a film on the Arundhatiyar community’s practice of ‘dedicating’ girls to the deity Mathamma. This was a practice akin to the devadasi system, where minor girls were given over to the temple, and exploited by the priests and the community. Manimekalai documented cases of children who had been sexually exploited for ten or twenty rupees.

 “I didn’t think I was going to make a film. I shot as much as I could in a day,” she says. When she went back to Chennai, she freelanced to pay the bills. Her friends helped out with the editing and sound-mixing. The 16-minute documentary, Mathamma incensed the Arundhatiyar community. She was vilified. Her own family was outraged. But the National Human Rights Commission took notice of the film, and marked it as evidence to crack down on the inhuman practice. Police action followed.

2004: Manimekalai goes to Tamil Nadu’s Siruthondamadevi village, to make a film on violence against Dalit women in Tamil Nadu. Parai, her 45-minute documentary draws the wrath of local politicians, upper caste communities, and even sections of Dalits, who attacked her higher caste status and accused her of painting them black. But the district collector intervened. “Seventeen caste Hindus who had violated and raped Dalit women were arrested.” Parai had served its purpose.

“Together, these two films triggered a successful video participatory movement that brought about government intervention, securing protection for women who were harassed in the name of caste,” says Manimekalai.

Her latest, and most controversial, film is Sengadal (The Dead Sea), a 102-minute “factual fiction feature” about the fishermen in Dhanushkodi, a tiny village that is the closest Indian point from Sri Lanka.

During the LTTE conflict in Lanka, Indian fishermen who went out to the sea were attacked by the Lankan troops, accused as rebels, spies or smugglers, and shot or maimed. Sengadal captures the plight of these poor fishermen, both Lankan and Indian, who struggle to survive here.

The film was hard-hitting and yet sensitive. Manimekalai developed her storyline and screenplay from the stories she gathered from the local community. She got fisher folk and refugees themselves to act in the film. But once it was ready, the censor board clamped down on it for its “denigrating remarks against the Indian government”, and because “it would affect the relations between India and Lanka. “

After a censorship battle fought over many months, Sengadal was finally released a few months ago with an A certificate. It won critical acclaim at many international film festivals, and last month, bagged the NAWFF (Network of Asian Women’s Award Film Festival) award in Tokyo as the best Asian Woman film of 2011. “Navi Pillai, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who saw the film at the Durban International Film Festival, has taken it as a witness of the human rights violations committed by the Sri Lankan Navy on the Indian Fishermen,” says Manimekalai.

Sengadal was not an aesthetic achievement, said film critics. But to Manimekalai, the subject was more important. “I know that Sengadal is far from being a cinematic accomplishment. The experiment was to work against my artistic ambitions, and focus on the issue.”

Filmmaking, for  Manimekalai, is necessarily ‘interventionist’. “My films are three-dimensional.  One, I showcase issues. Two, the local community tell their stories and participate in the making of the film. Three, once the film is made, I take it to the audience and initiate a dialogue with them,” says Manimekalai. In India, “I’ve taken my films to over 400 villages. That is important to me.”
ordinary village girl

Manimekalai hails from Maharajapuram, a remote village south of Madurai, a place where literacy was not common and dogmas were rarely breached. Her father was a college lecturer.
When Manimekalai went from being an ordinary village girl to a brilliant student in school and college, things took an unusual turn. She came from a farming family, and village custom dictated that girls marry their maternal uncle a few years after reaching puberty. “It was to escape that fate that I became a university rank-holder, not because I found studies interesting,” she says.

But good grades weren’t enough. She learnt that her family was making arrangements for her marriage with her uncle, who was a lawyer and an MP. She was 18 then, and in her second year at an engineering college in Madurai. “I’ve always been a rebel. Like my father and grandparents, I was also politically and socially active. I ran away to Chennai.” She walked into the offices of Vikatan, a popular Tamil magazine, hoping they would give her a job.

“Instead, they tricked me into waiting there while they contacted my family, and handed me over.” She then convinced her parents there was no way she would marry her uncle, and sold them her dream of pursuing higher studies in engineering.

love strikes
But life had other plans. In her final year in college, her father died. It had been his dream to publish as a book his doctoral thesis on celebrated Tamil director P Bharathiraja’s films. So 20-year-old Manimekalai found herself in Chennai again, this time to see if she could get Bharathiraja to pen a foreword for her father’s book. “I fell in love with him right away. Nothing else mattered but him. I stayed back to be with him. I wrote a poem for him every day. It was because of him that I began to take poetry seriously.” If she wanted to be with him, she had to choose: either act in films, or assist with direction. She chose to assist, and thus made her foray into cinema.

The series of scandals and controversies that would dog her also began there. Gossip magazines went to town about her relationship with the acclaimed filmmaker. Horrified by her relationship with the renowned but much-married filmmaker who was a few decades older than her, her family became desperate to bring her home. “My mother went on a hunger strike. I initially refused to give in, but her health deteriorated, and I had to give up cinema and Bharathiraja.”

11 jobs in 2 years
She forced herself to work as an engineer in the IT sector in Bangalore for a while, but her heart was in cinema. She met C Jerrold, a telefilm maker. His genre of popular films didn’t sit well with her, and she switched many jobs. “In two years, I changed 11 jobs, worked with many directors, and finally decided to become a freelancer.”

By then, Manimekalai had realised what she wanted to do: “give voice to the marginalised, speak about social issues, and make a political intervention, as only then can change happen.” And thus in 2002, she began work on her first film, Mathamma.

She hasn’t looked back since. Her strategy was to earn money from freelancing — she did everything from editing to sound-mixing — and spend it on her film projects. “My first professional training in  filmmaking was with an EU Fellowship in 2005.” She then won a series of fellowships, including the Commonwealth Fellowship (2008) and the Charles Wallace Art Award (2011). She travelled widely, with her films getting screened in international platforms across the world.

And today she is broke, thanks to her tendency to spend all her savings on her film projects. She’s been paying the house rent and bills with money borrowed from friends. And she is yet to fully pay the crew that worked on Sengadal.

But has her politics changed over the years? “Yes, of course. I don’t like a few of my earlier films anymore because I no longer agree with their politics. Many years from now, I might not like what I am making now. But what is important to me is that at this moment, I believe in everything I’m saying and doing. I am honest, not self-righteous. And I’m still evolving."

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement