The chief justice of India said that when justice Dinakaran's name was recommended for appointment as judge of the apex court there were no allegations against him.
Chief justice of India KG Balakrishnan today said the Supreme Court Collegium made a mistake in recommending the name of Karnataka High Court chief justice PD Dinakaran for appointment to the apex court and maintained that any judge found to have tresspassed any land is not fit to be elevated.
"Collegium takes a decision. I have to weed out things... We have committed a mistake," he said when asked if the Dinakaran issue had dented the image of judiciary.
"I am of the firm view that if any judge has tresspassed any land or has done anything against law, he is not fit to be elevated to the Supreme Court," the CJI told NDTV.
However, he said when justice Dinakaran's name was recommended for appointment as judge of the apex court there were no allegations against him.
"There was no allegation regarding Dinakaran when his name was recommended for the apex court. There was no allegation even when he was a judge in the Madras High Court nor when he was Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court."
When asked whether image of judiciary in aftermath of Dinakaran controversy has been lowered in the eyes of common man, the CJI said "No, people don't take seriously these things."
Responding to a question whether the apex court did not act in time on Dinakaran issue, the CJI said "What can we do. How can we prevent persons attacking some judge. We cannot do anything".
"We don't have any machinery to go into whether a land has been trespassed by somebody. So we thought law ministry or the Government has got some machinery to go into the matter so we recommended the matter to be inquired by them," he said.
Speaking on the Ruchika molestation case in which retired DGP SPS Rathore was held guilty after a long delay, the CJI said the case was prosecuted by the CBI and there are not enough of designated courts, on which "I wrote a letter about two-and-half years back".
"I think it is a CBI investigated case. CBI special courts are less in number and so I requested for at least 60 more CBI special courts. Special Courts should be established. Of course some steps have been taken but the courts are not coming into existence so far," he said.
When asked as to how he felt feel about the Ruchika case, Balakrishnan said, "It is a long period of course. It is a very disturbing trend but such cases are less. There have been cases in Rajasthan which finished in 10-15 days".
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
)
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
)
)
)
)
)
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}