Follow us:              
You are here: HOME > INDIA > Report

HC reserves order on sadhvi's bail in Malegaon blast case

Published: Tuesday, Feb 9, 2010, 15:17 IST
Place: Mumbai | Agency: PTI

The Bombay high court has reserved order on the bail plea of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, prime accused in the September 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case.

After the trial court rejected her bail plea, Sadhvi moved the High Court seeking liberty on the ground that chargesheet had not been filed within the stipulated 90-day period.

After hearing arguments of prosecution and accused, justice S C Dharmadhikari reserved the order yesterday.

Sadhvi's counsel Mahesh Jethmalani argued that she was illegally detained for 14 days by police before her arrest in this case.

He submitted that Sadhvi was picked up by the anti-terrorism squad (ATS) on October 10, 2008, whereas their record shows that she was arrested on October 23.

If she was actually taken into custody on October 10, the chargesheet should have been filed by January 9. Since it was filed ten days later, she is entitled to bail, he claimed.

ATS, on the other hand, contended that she was not illegally detained but was interrogated for ten days prior to her arrest.

Government's counsel, Amit Desai, argued that even if there were irregularities, the consequences could not be the release of the accused because she was facing grave charges.

Sadhvi and ten others are accused of masterminding and carrying out the Malegaon blasts on September 29, 2008, in which six persons were killed.

Claiming that Sadhvi was detained illegally by ATS, which probed the Malegaon blast case, her lawyer argued that even her interrogation was illegal because a woman cannot be
summoned to police station for mere questioning.

ATS started probing her role in the blast conspiracy after finding out that the motorcycle on which the bomb was planted belonged to her.

                     +    -
Share
©2012 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.
Top stories on DNAIndia.com » Popular content »
C.
Comments  |  Post a comment
Blogs »
99 or 100?

- Jayadev Calamur
C.
©2012 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.
D.0