New Delhi: In a significant victory for gay rights, the Delhi high court (HC) on Thursday declared as "unconstitutional and arbitrary" the 149-year-old law that criminalises consensual homosexual acts among adults. However, the court said that section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) will continue for non-consensual and non-vaginal sex involving minors.
"The court's decision marks respect for human rights -- irrespective of one's sexuality and sexual orientation," said Anjali Gopalan of Naz Foundation, the NGO that had filed the PIL in 2001, on which the court sounded its ruling. "Section 377 justified social, moral and legal repression of homosexuals. It was like being told 'you are criminal, because of who you are'. All this should change now. Homosexuals can now live with dignity and pride," said gay activist Ashok Row Kavi.
Going beyond decriminalising homosexuality, the Delhi HC has widened the ambit of article 15 of the constitution, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of sex, religion and caste. It has expanded the term sex to include sexual orientation. This means a person cannot be discriminated against on grounds of sexual preference.
Former additional solicitor general KTS Tulsi said the judgment, unless overruled by the Supreme Court, permits same-sex marriage, and a homosexual couple could even adopt children. "As it stands, section 377 denies a gay person the right to full personhood which is implicit in the notion of life under article 21," said the HC bench, comprising chief justice AP Shah and justice S Murlidhar. The section carried a maximum punishment of life imprisonment for homosexuality. "We clarify that our judgment will not result in the reopening of criminal cases involving section 377 that have already attained finality," the court said.
Underlining the significance of the ruling on AIDS control, Charles Gilks, UNAIDS country coordinator in India, said: "We hope this judgement will send a positive signal to many other countries, especially in south and West Asia, where sodomy is punishable by death."The order, however, came under sharp attack from religious and rightwing groups, although most political parties, including the BJP, played it safe by not taking a stand. Turn to p18
Readers' comments:
Landmark judgment indeed! Glad to see the courts steer clear of religious pressure and stand up for human rights and equality.
Thursday, July 2, 2009 20:59 IST
Ajit, Boston
I am surprised to see the learned judges talk of "human dignity" while striking down a portion of section 377. What is the "notion of human dignity" upheld by homosexuals? Is it dignifying for a man to wallow in the filthy southern end of another man? Is it dignifying for a woman to consider a lifeless dildo a worthy equivalent for her real self? By the way, no human (court or legislature) has absolute authority to tell us what is right or wrong. Only a Law Giver higher than humans can do that. Let us derive our morality from our Maker.
If section 377 should be struck down, it should be done just to set free many unwilling victims who are blackmailed by their "gay" predators on a daily basis. It should be struck down so that sick "gays" (yes, many of them get terribly sick!) can seek treatment without fear of prosecution. Let's come back to our senses!
Thursday, July 2, 2009 15:21 IST
Philip P. Eapen, Cochin
Definitely a step in the right direction. In a truly civilised society, the State should be kicked out of our private lives. Who we sleep with, how many, and what acts we do in private should not be for the State to dictate. Next step would be to throw out the State from our private lives altogether. All laws should be gone over with a fine-toothed comb to see that they apply equally to people of all religions, castes, sex, etc.
Thursday, July 2, 2009 15:16 IST
Rajesh Shenoy, Hyderabad
If this verdict allows consensual intercourse between two adults as their human right, then even unmarried couples, married couples having extramarital affairs, and prostitutes might seek favourable judgments in future. Can any legal authority clarify such fine lines of this verdict for the proper understanding of the common public? Of course, according to nature, homosexuality is absurd. Though civilised mankind gives liberty these days for such relations, it's a sick choice and those with such tendencies should undergo psychological counselling before these gays or lesbians get into a legal marriage.
Thursday, July 2, 2009 13:07 IST
Rahul.C, Mumbai