Twitter
Advertisement

Why was Article 355 not invoked during Gujarat riots, asks ex-VP Hamid Ansari

Lt Gen. (retd) Zameer Uddin Shah claims in his book 'The Sarkari Mussalman' that the transport was delayed for 24 hours for the Army which was sent to quell the 2002 Gujarat riots.

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

Former vice president Hamid Ansari on Saturday asked why was Article 355 of the Constitution not invoked by the then Union government during the 2002 Gujarat riots even when its Defence Minister was on the spot.

Ansari made the remarks during the launch of a book 'The Sarkari Mussalman' by Lt Gen. (retd) Zameer Uddin Shah, who has claimed that the transport was delayed for 24 hours for the Army which was sent to quell the 2002 Gujarat riots. Shah had led the Army Division that quelled the Gujarat riots in the state.

The event at the India International Centre was also attended by Shah's brother and actor Naseeruddin Shah.

'No military solutions to insurgency' 

The former vice president also said there were "no military solutions to insurgency" as normalcy can be restored only by winning the hearts and minds of people.

"'The initial reaction of the civil administration was tardy; curfew had been ordered but not enforced; no attempt were made to convene peace committees and attitude of police was partisan'," Ansari quoted some of the observations from Shah's book on the riots.

But, the former vice president observed, that the book was silent "about the role of the political leadership".

"If the civil and police administration fails to respond to a massive failure of law and order, where does the responsibility rests in a democratic and parliamentary system," he asked.

"Why was Article 355 of the Constitution that makes it a duty of the Union to protect a state against internal disturbance not invoked even when the Centre had the benefit of Raksha Mantri on the spot?" he asked.

Article 355 pertains to 'duty of the Union to protect states against external aggression and internal disturbance'. The reportage of Gujarat happenings in the national and international media was extensive and even the NHRC took note of it, he said.

"In an interview to a Malayalam weekly in 2005, former president K R Narayanan had revealed his remonstrations with the government and observed, and I quote (Narayanan) -- 'Military was sent but not given the power to shoot. And, there was a conspiracy involving the central and the state government behind the Gujarat riots'," he said.

Transport for troops was delayed, claims book

The book has kicked up a controversy, alleging that transport and other logistics support "arrived a day later" for the 3,000 army troops that had landed in Ahmedabad after communal riots broke out in the state.

Lt Gen. Shah, at the function, said he had met then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and then Defence Minister George Fernandes at the CM's residence at 2 AM on March 1 and sought transport and logistics support.

"But, the transport rolled in only on March 2," he alleged, adding "hundreds of officers from my formation can speak on that, and there are war diaries of the battalion".

However, Jasim Mohammad, director of Forum for Muslim Studies and Analysis, Aligarh, has countered the claims made by Shah in his book about the role of the then Gujarat government.

"Shah's claims in the book about the then Gujarat government is wrong. He had met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in March 2016, where I was also present and Shah sahab had praised Modi for providing support to the Army in 2002 as the chief minister," Mohammad claimed, adding, "how can these both things be true a the same time".

On Friday, Mohammad had even written a letter to Ansari, urging him not to attend the book release function.

Shah defends claim, says it is 'gospel truth'

Lt General Shah said that what he has written in his book is 'gospel truth', which is mentioned on 'war diaries' of the Indian Army.

"There was a difference between the report filed by me and the one by the Special Investigation Team (SIT). There was a difference of 24 hours. Certain channels claimed that I was lying. We were on the field for more than 24 hours. I do not want to pinpoint anyone, but this was the fault of the administration. I do not want to make any political statement," he said.

"I was not aware of the SIT report until a few days ago when this was pointed out to me. Let me say again, it is a blatant lie. I have told the truth," he added. 

As per Lt General Shah has said that around 3,000 troops landed at the Ahmedabad airfield by 7 am on March 1, but they had to wait for more than 24 hours to receive transport to move to the areas where the riots were taking place.

However, the SIT report on the same clearly stated that there was no delay in requisition and deployment of the Army.

(With PTI inputs) 

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement