Home »  News »  India

What I said about Narendra Modi was completely misconstrued: Girish Karnad

Thursday, 10 July 2014 - 6:00pm IST Updated: Wednesday, 9 July 2014 - 7:22pm IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA Webdesk
  • RNA Research & Archives

Girish Karnad who had openly criticised Narendra Modi as a 'dangerous man' long back before elections was misquoted by 'Times of India' recently which made the playwright see red. 

The publication carried a news quoting Karnad as someone who had suddenly shifted his ideologies and aligned with Narendra Modi's views after Modi became PM. "Narendra Modi is our Prime Minister, and we should accept it. I had expressed reservations about the post-Godhra carnage in Gujarat when Modi was chief minister. But after that, there have been no incidents to bring him a bad name. He has provided good governance," the publication quoted Karnad as saying in its frontpage headline. 

In a rebuttal, Karnad clarified the claims and explained his stance citing, "For the moment I can only assure you that the dirty tricks department of the TOI is unlikely to affect my political stance." 

Below is the full text: 

Clarification from Girish Karnad: 

On 5 July, at an event organized for the Chitra Film Society in Dharwad by its secretary, Abdul Khan, I was asked how I reacted to having Modi as the Prime Minister, given that I had criticised him earlier as a dangerous person. I replied that since the BJP had come to power through a perfectly constitutional process one had to accept and respect the verdict of the people. I said one should not be in a hurry to start criticising it, and added that the fact that there was such uniformity in the voting across the country could be taken as a sign that somehow democracy was working in India.

Next day, the Bangalore edition of the Times of India carried the report on its front page, discreetly consigning it to a corner although it added that I had expressed approbation of Modi's government which I had not. But one is used to little misquotations and tweakings in Indian journalism. As The Hindu correctly reported it , I had said that 'it would be too early to say anything about the style of functioning of the Modi government... Let us give him time.' 

I was therefore startled to receive angry emails from my friends outside Karnataka accusing me of treachery and selling out. It was only when Teesta Setalvad drew my attention to it that I realized that other editions of the TOI had in fact projected the story entirely differently, displaying on the front page my photograph with a saffron teeka on the forehead with a long story inside probably rewritten to match the mood. I was amazed that the TOI should so openly turn itself into a publicity rag for the Right. 

But I was more bothered that my left- wing friends, who had known me for years, should so easily accept what the TOI said about me and start lambasting me with accusations of betrayal. If you wanted evidence of the impact of the media, here it was!. I do not tweet or use the Facebook since I do not wish to turn my life into an endless response to ignorant comments. Perhaps as you and Teesta have indicated I should, in my untweeting Facebookless isolation, be more sensitive to the anxieties that are gripping the nation, and in particular, the Left.

For the moment I can only assure you that the dirty tricks department of the TOI is unlikely to affect my political stance.




Jump to comments