Home »  News »  India

Supreme Court shows some leniency to Subrata Roy but refuses to grant bail

Tuesday, 22 July 2014 - 7:38pm IST | Place: New Delhi | Agency: PTI

The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to release Sahara Chief Subrata Roy, who has been behind bars for nearly five months, on interim bail or parole but allowed selling of his luxury hotels in New York and London to raise money to deposit Rs 10,000 crore with SEBI as directed to get regular bail.

The apex court, however, assured 65-year-old Roy that it will allow him to go out of jail during day time under police custody to hold negotiations with buyers to dispose of his properties. "We will allow you to hold negotiations outside jail between 10 AM to 4 PM under police custody," a bench headed by Justice T S Thakur said, adding it is "premature" at this stage to make such arrangement as there is no "concrete" proposal right now.

The bench, also comprising justices Anil R Dave and A K Sikri asked him to approach the court when there is a proposal and assured him that suitable arrangements would be made by it. The bench also allowed Sahara to sell nine properties in the country along with hotels Dream Downtown and The Plaza in New York and Grosvenor House in London. It also appointed senior advocate Shekhar Naphade as amicus curiae to assist the court in dealing with the case in which the group is supposed to pay around Rs 37,000 crore to wind up the proceedings in the apex court.

Roy had pleaded that he be allowed to get out of jail on parole or on interim bail for at least 40 days to sell his properties to raise Rs 10,000 crore to get bail. Roy, who was sent to jail on March 4 this year for non-refund of over Rs 20,000 crore to depositors, was asked by the court to pay Rs 10,000 crore to get bail, out of which Rs 5,000 crore in cash and rest of the amount in bank guarantee.

Sahara has so far raised Rs 3,117 crore which has been deposited with the market regulator. The group, however, has been claiming that it has already repaid money to 93 per cent investors.

On the last day of hearing on July 4, Roy pleaded to the court to show 'raham'(mercy) and allow him to come out of jail to sell his properties. "Raham is what is required now in this case. Today he has spent more months behind bars and his release would enhance chances of negotiation for sale of properties," senior advocate Rajiv Dhawan, appearing for Roy, had submitted

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, who argued Roy's plea, expressed his dismay over the outcome saying he never expected the new bench to take such a "strict view on a person who has been in incarceration for more than four months". "I am astonished and deeply pained by the orders of this court. I have not sensed justice like this," he said. However, the bench told the senior advocate that it was not altering the terms of conditions set by the previous bench for grant of bail and the order passed today has some portion which was in his favour.

"We could have reduced your astonishment if it had been an appeal... Your astonishment should be with another bench," the apex court said while referring to the June 4 order passed by the bench of Justices K S Radhakrishnan (since retired) and J S Khehar. Dhavan said, "I (Roy) came to this bench with good faith. I have already deposited Rs 3,000 crore. No person can be sent to jail like this." The bench said, "we decided the case in our wisdom and your client may not like it. But we allowed you to sell nine of your domestic properties and also allowed you to sell your off-shore properties". As soon as Dhavan stopped, the bench said, "should we take leave now". This did not go well with Dhavan, who told the bench "Don't make fun of me. You gave me benefit of conversation".

Jump to comments

Recommended Content