Home » India

Supreme Court grants bail to Lalu Prasad Yadav in fodder scam case

Friday, 13 December 2013 - 12:28pm IST Updated: Friday, 13 December 2013 - 12:58pm IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA Web Team
CBI, which is the prosecuting agency in the case, did not oppose Prasad's bail plea.

The Supreme Court today granted bail to RJD chief Lalu Prasad in a fodder scam case, in a relief to the politician who is behind the bars for the last two months after being awarded a five-year jail term.

A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam granted bail after noting that several other similarly placed convicts have already been granted bail in the case.

The bench also comprising Justice Ranjan Gogoi, however, left it to the trial court to decide the bail bonds, sureties and other conditions to be imposed on the former Member of Parliament.

CBI, which is the prosecuting agency in the case, did not oppose Prasad's bail plea.

Pleading for bail, Prasad, who lost his membership of Parliament after being convicted in the case, submitted that of the 44 persons convicted along with him, 37 have been granted bail and no one's, except his bail plea has been rejected.

Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, appearing for the politician, submitted Prasad has already spent 12 months behind bars, including two months of his five-year sentence, and sought bail, saying the Jharkhand High Court before which his appeal is pending will take at least seven to eight years to decide the case.

Prasad had moved the apex court challenging the order of the Jharkhand High Court which had dismissed his bail plea.

The RJD chief, another former Bihar Chief Minister Jagannath Mishra and 43 others were on September 30 convicted by a special CBI court in the fodder scam case involving fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 37.7 crore from Chaibasa Treasury during the Prasad-led RJD regime.

The CBI court had pronounced varying prison terms for the convicted persons on October 3.

In his bail petition, the RJD chief had said, "No reason has been given by the court for the rejection of bail. The petitioner has been treated differently in the matter of grant of bail in as much as some of the co-accused, who are similarly situated, have been granted bail."


Jump to comments

Around the web