Home »  News »  India

Court to rule on May 2 on Enforcement Directorate chargesheet against DMK's A Raja, Kanimozhi and Dayalu Ammal

Wednesday, 30 April 2014 - 5:21pm IST | Place: Chennai | Agency: IANS
  • A Raja dna Research & Archives

A court on Wednesday reserved its order on taking cognizance of the chargesheet against former telecom minister A Raja, DMK MP Kanimozhi and Dayalu Ammal, the wife of DMK chief M Karunanidhi, among others for money laundering in the 2G spectrum allocation case.

Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Special Judge OP Saini fixed May 2 for delivering his order on the chargesheet filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against 10 people and nine companies.

On April 25, the ED filed the chargesheet naming Raja, Kanimozhi, Dayalu Ammal, Swan telecom promoters Shahid Usman Balwa and Vinod Goenka, directors of Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt. Ltd. Asif Balwa and Rajiv Agarwal, Bollywood producer Karim Morani, Kalaignar TV director Sharad Kumar and P. Amirthan as accused in the case.

The companies named are Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. (STPL), Kusegaon Realty Pvt. Ltd., Cineyug Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (Cineyug Films), Kalaignar TV (KTV) Pvt. Ltd., Dynamix Realty, Eversmile Construction Company Private Limited, Conwood Construction and Developers (P) Ltd., DB Realty Ltd., and Nihar Construction Pvt. Ltd.

The accused have been booked under various sections of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002.

"The investigation revealed that amount of Rs.200 crore was paid by promoters of the STPL, using their group entity Dynamix Realty, to KTV, through KFVPL and CFPL (Cineyug Films) in the garb of legitimate financial transaction, i.e. as loan/share application money," the ED counsel said.

The ED said the payment was illegal gratification for and on behalf of Raja and his associates in lieu of illegal favours given to the STPL for grant of UAS licence.

The ED apprised the court that investigation has further revealed that the return of Rs.200 crore has been done with an additional amount in order to show this as illegal payment in the guise of legal and bonafide financial transactions.

The investigating agency held that the entire amount of Rs.223.55 crore was, in fact, the proceeds of crime.




Jump to comments