trendingNow,recommendedStories,recommendedStoriesMobileenglish2565154

Ram Janmabhoomi Case: Heated drama witnessed in court room; next hearing on February 8

The final hearing is underway in the apex court.

Ram Janmabhoomi Case: Heated drama witnessed in court room; next hearing on February 8
Ayodhya

The Supreme Court on Tuesday commenced the final hearing on the long-standing Ram Janmabhoomi- Babri Masjid title dispute, a day before the 25th anniversary of the demolition of a medieval-era structure.

A specially constituted bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer are hearing a total of 13 appeals filed against the 2010 judgement of the Allahabad High Court in four civil suits.

A battery of high profile lawyers including senior advocates K Parasaran and C S Vaidyanathan and advocate Saurabh Shamsher will appear for Lord Ram Lalla, the deity, and Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta will represent the Uttar Pradesh government.

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Anoop George Chaudhari, Rajeev Dhavan and Sushil Jain will represent other parties including All India Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The high court had ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Ram Lalla.

Meanwhile, senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy on Sunday announced that the construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya will commence soon and devotees will be able to celebrate the next Diwali there.

A fortnight ago, RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat made a strong pitch for building Ram temple on the disputed site at Ayodhya, saying only a mandir would come up there and not any other structure.

"We will construct it. It is not a populist declaration but a matter of our faith. It will not change," Bhagwat had said.

LIVE Blog
05 Dec 2017
03:36 PM

Matter listed for February 8.

03:12 PM
03:11 PM

Kapil Sibal, representing Sunni Waqf board has urged SC to hear the matter after July 15, 2019.

02:24 PM

►​ Sibal who is representing Sunni Waqf Board raised doubts over assertions of ASG Mehta that how come more than 19000 pages of documents can be filed in such short time.

► Sibal told SC he and other petitioners have not been served relevant documents of pleadings.

02:22 PM

► Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, representing the State of Uttar Pradesh rebutted all the averments of Kapil Sibal.

► Mehta told SC that all the related documents and requisite translation copies are on record.

02:21 PM

Kapil Sibal told the three-judge bench of the Supreme Court that all these exhibits are not filled before this court.He submitted, all the pleadings are not complete

02:21 PM

Ayodhya dispute: Senior advocate Kapil Sibal is reading out in SC the details of exhibits filed by the contesting defendants before the Allahabad High Court

02:11 PM

► A three-judge bench of the Allahabad High Hourt, in a 2:1 majority ruling, had said the land be partitioned equally among three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

 

02:11 PM

► A sect of Muslims, under the banner of Shia Central Waqf Board of Uttar Pradesh, had earlier approached the court offering a solution that a mosque could be built in a Muslim- dominated area at a 'reasonable distance' from the disputed site in Ayodhya.

LIVE COVERAGE

TRENDING NEWS TOPICS
More