trendingNow,recommendedStories,recommendedStoriesMobileenglish1521240

Singh is king! Really? Does not seem so

The standard operating procedure that Indian politicians follow is tailored for our polity with its ugly underbelly

Singh is king!  Really? Does not seem so

The standard operating procedure that Indian politicians follow is tailored for our polity with its ugly underbelly. For instance, a politician’s ‘aide’ could be anyone who facilitates his or her activities in public view or behind the shuttered doors of the bungalows in Lutyens’ Delhi.

Pimping for politicians is one of the most lucrative jobs in the nation’s capital and comes without an appointment letter or a paper trail: If things ever go wrong for our cynical politicians, there’s always plausible deniability. That option has been exercised by Captain Satish Sharma, who has stoutly denied that he ever had an ‘aide’ called Nachiketa Kapur, leave alone using his services to bribe MPs in the last Lok Sabha to enable the UPA to win the crucial trust vote on July 22, 2008, after the Left withdrew its support over the India-US civil nuclear deal.

But neither Sharma nor his party can deny that there was a person called Nachiketa Kapur or that he had access to the inner courtyard of the PWD-built haveli that has come to substitute Bahadur Shah Zafar’s court in amoral, if not grossly immoral, Delhi where issues of ethics are of least concern for those who claim to rule India. That Kapur, whoever he may be, wielded considerable power (without accountability) and was politically well-connected is borne out by the fact that the American embassy in New Delhi was sufficiently impressed to send him on a junket under the US state department’s ‘I-Vote 2008’ programme as an observer for the US presidential election.

It, therefore, stands to reason that the contents of the ‘Secret’ US Embassy cable of July 17, 2008, filed by its then charge d’affaires Steven White, are not without substance. The cable mentions, among other things, how the Congress mobilised funds to buy votes to win the confidence motion and the manner in which the funds were distributed and to whom. The ‘price’ for a ‘Yes’ vote was Rs10 crore; the embassy’s political counsellor was shown chests containing between Rs50 crore and Rs60 crore to be used for purchasing votes. The cable also mentions Sharma providing details of how he was trying to target MPs within the BJP and its allies, for instance, the Akali Dal. He owed this much to the party that had bailed him out in 15 cases of corruption filed by the CBI.

Senior BJP leaders will confirm that during the week before the vote, they were desperately scrambling to keep their flock together. The lure of lucre is not easy to overcome. In any event, few MPs wanted an early election - if that could be avoided and easy money pocketed, where was the harm? Some BJP back-benchers began to question the wisdom of opposing the nuclear deal as a cover for their imminent act of disloyalty. The Akali Dal, not sure of preventing its MPs from straying, wondered whether opposing the deal was the right move as there was a large Sikh community in the US and they wouldn’t take kindly to America-bashing. It may sound laughable in retrospect, but that’s exactly what was conveyed to the BJP. The BJP’s apprehensions came true when cash was actually handed over to some of its MPs by an ‘aide’ of Amar Singh, who had also offered his services and resources to prop up the UPA regime.

Political parties are known to try till the last minute to avoid a mid-term exit from power. The NDA government would not have fallen by a single vote in 1999 if its political managers had been alert to the Congress’s strategy of getting Giridhar Gomango to participate in the voting despite his having taken charge as CM of Odisha. He still remained a Lok Sabha member and exercised his privilege, although it was both immoral and unethical to do so. Nor should we forget that JMM members were bribed to ensure the PV Narasimha government’s survival, such subversion of the ethical foundations of democracy comes naturally to the Congress.

Two points should bother us more than anything else. First, the Americans had a remarkably accurate sense of the voting pattern five days before the vote. As per their estimate, there would be 273 votes in favour and 251 against the trust motion, with 19 abstentions. After the vote, the tally stood at 275 votes in favour and 256 against the motion, with 10 abstentions. Who briefed the US embassy?

Second, prime minister Manmohan Singh was all smiles when he was greeted with cheers of “Singh is king” after he won the vote. The king today looks no different from the emperor without clothes.

LIVE COVERAGE

TRENDING NEWS TOPICS
More