Home > Entertainment > Review

Where's the zing, Mr King?

Aniruddha Guha
Friday, August 8, 2008 18:37 IST
Email Email
Print Print
Share Share

Singh is Kinng
Cast: Akshay Kumar, Katrina Kaif, Om Puri, Sonu Soon
Director: Anees Bazmee
Rating: **

Singh Is Kinng' (SIK) has about five very funny scenes, one good action sequence and two good songs. If watching a two-hour plus film with these few entertaining scenes spread far between is your idea of a fun time, then SIK is the film for you.

Of course, there's the King himself - Akshay 'the Midas touch' Kumar. In the seventies and eighties there were films that had not-too-great storylines, but the towering presence of Amitabh Bachchan. He posed, spouted clap-worthy dialogues, danced, fought and audiences came back smiling.

Without exaggerating a little too much, Akshay Kumar is slowly and steadily attaining a similar iconic status - a 'safe' proposal for producers who are assured of getting their investments back by banking on Akshay's star power and histrionics.

'Singh Is Kinng' is one of those films. Akshay is pretty much the life, providing relief with his lately unmatchable comic timing, breathtaking stunts and prancing around with the sexy Katrina Kaif. And he does it all with aplomb.

If only the script had given Akshay half as much assistance, especially in the second half, this film would have worked big time! Instead, it meanders towards the usual Anees Bazmee climax (seen in his last two super-hits 'No Entry' and 'Welcome') where chaos reigns. However, forget laughing in your aisles, you hardly manage a smile while watching the proceedings.

The story is interesting. Happy (Akshay) is the village smartass every one is fed up of. The villagers therefore hatch a plan to send him away to Australia so that he can bring back village boy Lakhan aka Lucky (Sonu Sood) who is now a big gang-lord in Australia, and referred to as King.

Once in Australia, Happy tries convincing Lucky and his associates (all Sardars from the same village) to return home. However, Lucky gets semi-paralysed during a shootout and Happy is made King instead. Happy goes about transforming the gang members from ruthless criminals to soft-hearted social workers, who then join forces to help Happy win over Sonia (Katrina Kaif), who Happy loves but is about to get married to Ranvir Shorey.

The film is extremely fast paced initially and the sharp editing and picturesque cinematography keep you entertained. The songs 'Bhootni Ke', 'Jee Karda' and the title track, which all appear in the first half, are all foot-tapping.

Once Happy is made King, the film promises to be a laughathon. Sadly, the film manages to draw guffaws only at certain places. Akshay's facial hair oscillates between a beard to a stubble to a goatee and the continuity jerks are hard to miss. The film also suffers due to weak characterizations.

Javed Jaffrey, who plays Lucky's brother Mika, talks in an accent that's hardly decipherable, Jaffrey portrays a partially deaf and blind character and most of his histrionics fail to evoke any laughter whatsoever.

Another flawed character is that of Shorey who goes from being a nice guy to a comedian to a villain to the nice guy in the end. Two very good actors have thus been wasted. Kirron Kher, although good, is getting repetitive with her loud Punjabi mother act.

The rest of the cast does a good job. Om Puri especially is a treat and takes away the applause in most scenes. Sonu Sood, Neha Dhupia, Sudhanshu Pandey, Manoj Pahwa and Yashpal Sharma are all extremely competent.

Katrina Kaif has had a good run since she stepped into the industry and is considered a lucky mascot by many. However, here she shows that she's not just a PYT who can dance and look good. I mean, yeah she can do that! Looking gorgeous, she is a treat to the eyes in both western and Indian outfits. Her dancing is extremely eye-filling too.


But where Katrina springs a pleasant surprise is in the acting department. The company of Akki in most of her films is clearly rubbing off, and very similar to him, she is getting better with every film.

Akshay Kumar, of course, is what the film is all about in the end. He's competent in emotional scenes, lovable in the romantic ones, entertaining in the funny ones, and as usual a pro while performing stunts. Any Akshay fan will love SIK.

If only the film had any zing, 'Singh Is Kinng' could have been the blockbuster of the year.

g_aniruddha@dnaindia.net

digg reddit google Facebook MySpace delicious

Post your comment

Readers' comments:
I have seen the movie, very Boring and very unimprssive.
Waste of uqality time. Katrina has very short role to do, sje acts as if se is a model hired for acting in as an actor.
Monday, August 11, 2008 15:13 IST
Harry
I really appreciate the level of understanding and sensitivity displayed by the author towards Kashmiri Muslims. But my problem is that the very same understanding seems to vanish for rest of the people of India. Amarnath is a piece of ice. But in that case, Mecca is also a piece of meteorite rock. What makes the author feel that the one is more importnant than the other.

Our government happily spends crores of rupees to keep our muslim brethren in comfort while visiting the piece of meteorite on the annual Hajj. And they should. Kashmiri Muslims, our co-citizens, happily partake of all the facilities offered by the Indian state (and again, they should).

But then they feel the threat of "hinduization", mentioned by the author, if similar facilities are offered to people believing in ice-blocks instead of meteorite-rocks. This is when the threat of "hinduisation" of the valley is already take care of in the valley. They did not complain, and nor did the Indian state, when the extremists in Kashmir forcibly evicted the small Hindu minority (kashmiri pundit's).

This way the threat of any hinduistation mentioned by the author has already considerably diminished in the valley. What the author fails to understand is that Kashmiri muslims are not a powerless minority in the state. They have held (and abused) numerical, cultural and political power in the state almost constantly since independence.

Let the author talk to the politically and culturally deprived minorities of the state including the ladhakis, the jammu dogras, kasmiri pundits, even kargil's shia muslims, and then use imaginary terms like "hinduization" for J&K.
Monday, August 11, 2008 12:04 IST
Omar
sir,since i have not seen the picture onto this,but in the hearings it is clear there has someting been wrong that has given hit to the sikh religion . This is not good to playing with ones consents.It is true pictures are a part of enjoyment and some pictures also give the message of humanity like that of "TARE ZAMEEN PAR" ,pictures should not be so that lead to controverces among religions in india
Friday, August 8, 2008 20:42 IST
haroon
How stupid can this writer be when everyone, the writer, director producers have clearly stated that this is a brainless film. Not to look for logic in script. So why is he or she talking about "If only the script had given Akshay half as much assistance, especially in the second half, this film would have worked big time!" That is the point of this film. Not a gripping script just happy frolic fun!
Friday, August 8, 2008 19:39 IST
Jhateendra
Mumbai mindset
Ritam Banerjee exhibited his perception of Mumbai city during the opening of his photography exhibition Mumbai: The City That Talks to Me.
Heady bouquet
The launch of the Mumbai arm of the Delhi wine club saw many of the city's glitterati come out for an evening under the stars.

Get daily news in your inbox and read it at your convenience.

D