Follow us:              
You are here: HOME > BLOGS >

Why not just play baseball instead?

| Monday, March 9, 2009

726 runs in a day, and that with five overs lost because the Kiwis got bowled out. If not for a couple of stupid runouts up front, they would have chased down India's 392. In the end, numbers nine and ten were threatening to take the Kiwis home. When somebody like Kyle Mills starts tonking sixes at will against one of the top three ODI attacks in the world, you know the game has been reduced to a farce.
What makes cricket a far more nuanced game than baseball are the multiple factors that come into play simply by virtue of the ball having to be bowled into a pitch, rather than hurled on the full. But if the pitch has no pace or bounce or spin, and the ground is tiny to boot, then cricket becomes deadly dull because there's no contest between bat and ball at all. At least in baseball, the ball is flung from a shorter distance and the bat is cylindrical; so there's a contest.
The thrill of watching a batsman sashay down the pitch to a spinner is the risk involved in it - if the ball spins off the pitch past the bat, the batsman is left stranded and gets stumped; or, if the batsman misreads the flight and fails to get to the pitch of the ball, he's liable to miscue the shot and hole out in the deep. Remove the risk and there's no thrill - which is what happens on a flat track and tiny ground: the ball can't spin past the bat and even a mishit will clear the ropes.
It's equally one-dimensional when the pace bowlers operate. Normally, a batsman can get into strife, for instance, if he plays forward to a ball that is short of a length because he can get caught out by the bounce or deviation. But if the pitch will negate all that, then it's just a matter of picking up the line of the ball from the moment it leaves the bowler's hand and playing through that line. On top of that, the ground is tiny - so, all you need to ensure is that you don't miss the line (as Yuvraj eventually did) and that you have a good, solid bat so that even a push through the covers will take the ball to the boundary or a lap sweep to a yorker will carry it over fine leg for six.
Such a pitch and ground devalue the game as well as the skills not only of bowlers but also batsmen. What's the distinction between a Sachin Tendulkar and a Kyle Mills if both can hit sixes with impunity?

Article continues below the advertisement...
Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article. For reprint rights click here
More posts by :
Comments  |  Post a comment
By Gargoyle
Mar 20, 2009
Mr Ashish seems not to get the point of the article at all! It's not about India-bashing as he seems to be deluded in thinking. The article is about the state of one-day cricket today with flatter and deader pitches and more and more rules being put in to make it a batsmen’s paradise (aka Power Plays)!

Cricket is supposed to be a contest between bat and ball. One-day cricket today is just about which team can bash more runs — the bowling is almost irrelevant!

When was the last time you saw a bowler run through a side, Mr Ashish? Is it because the bowlers of today are less skilled? Or is it due to something else?

Hence, it’s just a slog fest! And it takes far less skill to slog on flat pitches in small stadiums! Hence even a highly skilled batsman like Sachin can be outdone by batsmen of LESS SKILL! Is that what you want to see, Mr Ashish?

Not much of a connoisseur of good cricket, are you? At least start reading straight!
By Rita
Mar 12, 2009
Yeah, so right. Well written!
By Ashish
Mar 11, 2009
Why be so sceptical about every Indian win? It is easy to sit in a chair and write about all the theories you have. But the point is that at the end of the day India won, stupid runouts and dropped catches notwithstanding. And why criticise Sachin every time he does well? The fact is he got 163 runs, small ground, big bat, dead pitch, etc. No one else scored so many runs on that day. Take a chill pill and start seeing the good side of things. Or also start criticising the Aussies, the Brits, the Kiwis, the Springboks, the Sri Lankans, the Pakistanis (whatever little they have left), and so on. And when you are done with that, you have IPL teams to grind your axe with.
  


Popular blogs
Most...
©2012 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.
D.0