Follow us:              
You are here: HOME > BLOGS >

When you lack conviction, it shows

| Friday, July 1, 2011

One of the best examples of a politician who overshadowed her party and became larger than the party is that of Indira Gandhi. She had her excesses and can certainly be accused of corrupting Indian polity in various ways. But it is undeniable that she was extraordinarily bold and decisive.When she entered politics she was taken lightly by the then Congress stalwarts and was dubbed Goongi gudiya (dumb doll). By the time she had acquired legendary status, Indira Gandhi was described as the invincible"Durga" by none other than Atal Bihari Vajpayee as leader of opposition in 1971.

That was the year when she had stood up to US pressure and had sent in the army into East Pakistan to create Bangladesh. Her other bold decisions were to impose the Emergency and launch Operation Blue Star in 1984 to flush out terrorists from the Golden Temple, for which she paid with her life. This was also the extraordinary woman who split the Congress vertically, waved her hand and gave birth to Congress (I)- the party as it exists today.

At major turning points in life, destiny calls upon you to take decisive action. There's no light in the tunnel; just a glimmer of hope, and the future is uncertain. What matters is whether you have the power of conviction, steely determination and the will to proceed, for better or worse.

Article continues below the advertisement...

One sees this typically in the lives of great personalities- for example, the famous train incident in South Africa when a certain Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was thrown out of the first class compartment. Early in life, a young Vinayak Bhave (later Vinoba), had decided he had no use for educational certificates and he took the extreme step of putting them in the fire. As a young man, Baba Amte's heart would not allow him to go home till he attended to a dying leper in the gutter. Every life has its turning points and there are choices to be made, often tough ones.

Maharashtra's most recent political spectacle revolved round the crisis of senior BJP leader Gopinath Munde: to leave or not leave the party? When an individual feels intensely throttled in an organisation, it is better to plan and leave quietly- not issue threats, not imagine that you are indispensable and not make a nuisance of yourself. The future may be tough in the new environment, but if you have the power of conviction, it is unlikely to be stifling.

A prominent OBC leader from Marathwada, Munde had almost got out of the shadow of his dynamic brother-in-law, the late Pramod Mahajan, and had created a place for himself in Maharashtra politics. Notwithstanding his denials, what was the recent turmoil all about, if not about him leaving the BJP to join the Congress?

Likemoving to a rival firm after 30 years experience, Munde expected to be rewarded adequately by the Congress. Comfort seemed to matter more than conviction.Therefore, when his expectations fell through, Munde faltered,decided to stay back in the BJP, and suffered considerable loss of face in the process.

When you lack the power of conviction, as is happening with the UPA's handling of the Lokpal and black money issues, it shows. All the more if you are in the public arena.

v_abhay@dnaindia.net

Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article. For reprint rights click here
More posts by :
Comments  |  Post a comment
By Vivek
Jul 7, 2011
It is high time a proper Resoning is required for a Politician to quit the Party on whose symbol he/she has won the elections. Further it should be compulsary to quit and win the same consitituency on other party symbol or as independent . Tough measures are required for any shifting. Indian Politicians have taken Indians as Sheeps and Goats and to put it rightly as Shashi Tharoor quoted for something but not related to this - CATTLE CLASS , we are assumed to be in the same category by our all Respected Holinesses our dear Politicians.

In an another view I explore why all these Politicians require Z Plus security - if they feel so insecure - why are they in Politics let them lead a Saints life or otherwise let them pay for the Security they are requiring.
Await post on my views.
By AJ
Jul 4, 2011
I think a lot of folks, rather than risk being branded as gutless or dummies, foolishly venture out of the comfort zone into something they themselves might not have the 100% conviction for. Wiser thing in which case would be to stay put in the comfort zone (obviously you like what you are doing else you wouldnt be in the comfort zone inthe first place !!! )
says:

 


"Comfort Zone" is a term synonymous with complacency. You tend to rot in the comfort zone which is not a good idea. It is best to like what you are doing and yet challenge yourself with higher goals. Sachin Tendulkar is an example.

By Rohitkumar
Jul 4, 2011
The problem with people with strong convictions and beliefs is that their minds are not free or open. They can't listen to opposing views, nor can they tolerate opposition or resistance. Would you say Indiara Gandhi was tolerant? Was her "bold" decision to impose Emergency, subverting democracy, good? Was her another "bold" decision to have the Allahbad high court verdict nullifying her election thrown out by passing a law in the parliament good? What good the convictions of Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini did? What were the convictions of Osama Bin Laden good for? What good the convictions of naxals are doing?

There is nothing like a free mind, unencumbered by convictions and beliefs!
says:

You are certainly right. Conviction stands for firmness of belief. However, if someone is able to convince you through the power of argument, you should be willing to accept that your conviction was wrong. For all the negative examples that you have given, would we have got our independence without the freedom fighters being driven by their conviction? Progress happens because of unreasonable people, said George Bernard Shaw. Unreasonable people are not always wrong.

By Vinay K Nayasar
Jul 3, 2011
First of all I would like to appreciate you for writing such a crsip and well crafted article of Conviction. Great!
But, In my own professional work experience of 16 years, what I have realize that to be intelligent and diplomatic is necessary to come near the leadership position and then to take leadership one has to become Bold and Decisive, like the way Indira Ghandhi did.
says:

Yes, Mr Nayasar, your point is well taken.

By aju
Jul 3, 2011
Conviction right or wrong have their cascade effects.If one follows conviction with pious approach he wins the masses. Wrong convictions eliminate the person till he makes mends.UPA II is head deep in corruption and does not want to address common man's sufferings.The writing on the wall is clear-get rid of corrupt leaders.
By Subhash Angadi
Jul 2, 2011
Very well written article on current & immediate past political figures around us.
By Gopal Ji Gupta
Jul 2, 2011
I fully agree with you that conviction is more important since it works from within and does miracles if you stand firmly by it.People ignore conviction because they want to remain in comfort zone by taking side of secured and risk free decision.But following conviction has no match and give total satisfaction which can not be expressed in words.
By Gopal Ji Gupta
Jul 2, 2011
I fully agree with you that conviction is more important since it works from within and does miracles if you stand firmly by it.People ignore conviction because they want to remain in comfort zone by taking side of secured and risk free decision.But following conviction has no match and give total satisfaction which can not be expressed in words.
  


Popular blogs
Most...
©2012 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.
D.0