Follow us:              
You are here: HOME > BLOGS >

Saugandh Ram Ki Khaatein Hain Mandir Wahin Banayenge

| Thursday, September 30, 2010

It was sometime in October 1990, I first saw Lal Krishna Advani.

Advani was on his Rath Yatra across the country starting from the Somnath Temple in Gujarat on September 25, 1990.

He had made a one night stopover atthe guest house in the colony we used to live. Before proceeding in the morning Advani made a small speech which he concluded with the following line: "SaugandhRam Ki Khaatein Hain Mandir Wohi Banayenge".

Article continues below the advertisement...

It need not be said this was met with a thunderous applause from the small crowd that had gathered to hear Advani.

The women of the colony could later be heard discussing and saying "kitna acha bole na".

This Rath Yatra was undertaken in an air-conditioned van which was decorated to look like a chariot, started from Somnath in Gujarat and had covered a large part of Northern India until it was brought to a halt by the Chief Minister of Bihar, Laloo Prasad Yadav (now Lalu Prasad Yadav). The yatra was originally supposed to end at Ayodhya.

As Advani writes in his autobiography My Country My Life "My yatra was scheduled to enter Deoria in Uttar Pradesh on 24 October. However, as I had anticipated, it was stopped at Samastipur in Bihar on 23 October and I was arrested by the Janata Dal government in the state then headed by Laloo Prasad Yadav. I was taken to an inspection bungalow of the irrigation department at a place called Massanjore near Dumka on the Bihar-Bengal border (Dumka now comes under the state of Jharkhand)."

The politics of fear was never used so well by any other politician/party in India except for the Indian National Congress (which I will look at a little later). And it did work for a while.

Bharitya Janta Party was formed in 1979 when the Janta Party split (It existed under the name of Jan Sangh before merging with the Janta Party in 1977). In the 1984 Lok Sabha electionsthe party got two seats. It got wiped out under the sympathy wave that happened after Indira Gandhi was assassinated on October 31, 1984.

In the 1989 Lok Sabha elections, BJP in alliance with the Janta Dal, faced a Bofors tarred Indian National Congress and Rajiv Gandhi. It managed to increase its number of seats to 88.

It was after this that Advani decided to go on a Rath Yatra. The impact was seen in the 1991 Lok Sabha elections when the party (this time not in alliance with Janta Dal and competing on its own) managed to increase the number of seats to 118. This happened under the background of Rajiv Gandhi being assassinated while the Lok Sabha elections were still on and that leading to a sympathy wave in favour of the Congress party.

Now how many seats BJP would have won if Rajiv Gandhi had not been assassinated there is no way of finding out. But it would have definitely won more than the 118 it eventually ended up with.

The moral of the story, the Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid issue helped catapult BJP from being a small political front of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh to being a party which had substantial following across parts of Northern, Western and Eastern India.

But what Advani did then is a time tested method that politicians have followed over the years.

As his well known by now a section of the Indian National Congress (back then known as the Congress (I)) whipped up mass frenzy against the Sikhs after the assassination of Indira Gandhi.

In the carnage that followed Sikhs were killed all over NorthernIndia. The Lok Sabha elections of 1985, the Congress won a whopping 415 seats of the 540 odd seats. A feat that had never been achieved before that, has never been achieved after that, and in all probability will never be achieved again.

Or take the case of the Shiv Sena which started with Bal Thackeray's attempts at filling fear in the minds of the Marathi Manoos against the South Indians (or lungis as they were colloquially referred to) in the sixties and the seventies.

Consider the politics that a party like Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) indulges in. Before forming the BSP Kanshi Ram had formed the Dalit Soshit Samaj Sangharsh Samiti or DS4 as it was more popularly known as. The rallying cry of DS4 was "Thakur, Brahmin, Bania Chhod, Baki Sab Hain DS4.""

This slogan gave birth to the more famous slogan which became the rallying cry for BSP in Uttar Pradesh, a few years back. "Tilak Tarazu aur Talwaar, inko maaro joote chaar." ( Tilak , Tarazu and Talwar referrring to the Brahmans, the Banias and the Thakurs, respectively).

Lalu Prasad Yadav ruled Bihar for 15 years directly and through proxy by building a deadly combination of Muslim and Yadav votes (or MY as the media referred to it) which almost never let him down.

Or take the case of Raj Thackeray. Currently he is busy creating fear in the minds of the Marathi Manoos against people from North India (or bhaiyas, as they are colloquially referred to. And North India isn't exactly North India, in Mumbai parlance bhaiyas now include Biharis also, and Bihar definitely does not come in North India).

Down south, Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam, gained ascendance by protesting against the Hindi language and putting fear in the mind of the people of Tamil Nadu about Tamil pride being at stake.

<< Previous | Page 1 | Page 2 | Single Page | Next >>
Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article. For reprint rights click here
More posts by :
Comments  |  Post a comment
By Ravi Chhabra
Nov 27, 2010
Excellent writeup Sir. Do you recollect I was in touch with you when you were in DNA (are you still there?). It would be nice exchanging thoughts and views. Regards Ravi
By Ram Pratap Singh
Nov 6, 2010
Nice one. I appreciate this article.
By Shailesh Jha
Oct 30, 2010
Wonderful article Vivek. I appreciate you writing such a nice, eye-opener research on our Indian politics. I agree, we need to search for fresh people-engaging topics to come up with success in the next elections.

I also read all the comments made by readers and I would like to comment on the comments of Deepak.

@Deepak,
Don't think that Mumbai is only of Maharashtra. It is a part of India, moreover the financial capital of our country, hence all Indians have a right to go there and earn their livelihood if they can. However, as far as the question of Bihar or UP is concerned, of course, if their local government will support in improving their infrastructure and the security issues, I can bet you these states will grow faster than any states have grown ever as the most talents are available there. So, think yourself fortunate as these states do not have too much options for engaging people of their own state and that's why the revenue of your state is growing.
By Rajkumar
Oct 30, 2010
Nice article. In our own country hindus are afraid to say 'I'm a Hindu'. Saying that is anti-secular to all our political parties.
By Rahul
Oct 18, 2010
Excellent article!
By kiran
Oct 16, 2010
@deepak, totally agree with you.

vivek, you truly need to look into the history of politics. Don't read shivsena blindly. look into the history what was the time then in Mumbai in 1960-70.
By deepak
Oct 14, 2010
Vivek, are you from one of those worst states like Bihar or UP and migrated to Maharashtra? If yes then I can understand your hatred toward Shivsena. You people will never understand how Shivsena has helped and is helping Maharashtrians and then Hindus. Shivsena artificially never added fear in Marathi Manoos. It's because of those third-class Biharis and UPwallahs who are migrating to Maharashtra like hell. You seem to be one of them. If you have true guts why don't you guys work in your own states? Develop your own states and don't make Maharashtra dirty.
By Rahul P Tiwari
Oct 14, 2010
Shree Rohitkumar, you are not sounding secular, sir. this is very much communal, anty-Hinduism. Let me remind you there is a difference between secularism and anty-Hinduism. God bless you and hope will give you a better way of thinking. I love you as you are a human first of all.
By Rohitkumar
Oct 12, 2010
Shri Gour Mohanty,

India is a secular state because a vast majority of Indians, including a vast majority of Hindus, prefer secularism.

How could a handful of foreign invaders humiliate such a big majority of Hindus? Here is a story I had heard years ago: A Muslim sultan invaded a Hindu kingdom. The sultan could not understand why there were so many campfires in the Hindu garrison. His aide explained to him that the Hindu fighters of each caste were cooking their own food. The sultan said if the Hindus could not even cook and eat together, then they could also not fight together. Next day the sultan defeated the Hindus who could not fight together even for their own sake, and for their kingdom's (country's) sake. This may not be a true story, but it sounds plausible.

You bemoan the Arab conquest of Sindh. But it was a Hindu king, Jaichand, who invited the Afghan ruler to invade India, and that is how Muslim rule started. And when the Hindu Peshwa Bajirao Mastani laid siege to Delhi when the Mogul ruler was away, Delhi's big Hindu population closed the city's gates to defend the city, and prepared to fight the Hindu invaders. You may find many such instances if you care to explore history.

Without the help of the Hindus, a handful of foreigners could never have ruled over India.
By moos
Oct 10, 2010
UP and Bihar are parts of North India, as North India is not a geographical definition but a historical one.
By hindu militant
Oct 6, 2010
THANK YOU for giving all references and books to read on mob mind control. I will learn these and practise in politics, controlling people with fear. Good start to my political career. Take a guess which side I am on? Damn right, Hindu right.
By Rahul P Tiwari
Oct 6, 2010
"Minds are like parachutes, they only function when they are open." Fear blocks minds. I don't think nowadays any political party can block the minds of people. There were the days when we used to fight in the name of stupid things. But after the verdict of Ayodhya, it's clear that political parties need to come out with some decent issues, not TEMPLE or MOSQUE. Some MULAYAMS and LALUS are there, but they will get open-minded politicians who can think upon something intellectual. ALL THE BEST INDIA, AND VERY WELL DONE.
By Gour Mohanty
Oct 6, 2010
A typical Hindu mindset which is a product of a thousand years (nay, 1300 to be accurate) of slavery, since the Arab invasion of Sindh. And, mind you, throughout the entire period the Hindus were a majority. Kalohayam nirabadhi (Time is limitless) and Vipulancha Prithwi (vast indeed is this world), wrote Bhavabhuti, the great Sanskrit poet. Yet we never see in any part of this vast world and at any point of time lakhs of people being haunted, hounded and banished from their ancestral place like the Kashmir Pundits, becoming refugees in their country in which their own Hindu community forms an overwhelming majority of nearly eighty per cent. Please do ponder over this. Please try to regain a little pride, a little self-respect as a Hindu that has been obliterated by a millennium of slavery. Until that Sri Ram will be meaningless for you. I am sorry that the present generation is being fed with an overdose of secular-opiate.
By Nisha
Oct 4, 2010
Fear is a weapon used by the Congress often to scare Hindus into any action anytime fearing backlash. So stimuli can be anything, response ought to be to offer another cheek or another life? No siree, Hindus will not be divided on caste anymore. The Mulayams of the world can try hard, but Hindus will not be divided anymore...
By Chops.
Oct 3, 2010
What a load of single-sentence sermons on politically much larger issues which confront India's multi-cultural and multi-religious society. How the young Indian writers of today base their eloquence on the so-called timidity of the Hindu majority is mind-boggling. They themselves are fearful of stating the truth, which is that all of us are afraid to stand up for the only truly tolerant religion in India, Hinduism, which has been exploited to get minority support of various hues. Secularism eventually means tolerance of others. It is a God-given faculty and not a gift from our politicians!
By Taral Prakash Bhatt
Oct 3, 2010
Yes Vivek. I am happy to note that you are a liberated entity who does not fall victim to the fear that Advani tried to create. It was this freedom from fear that resulted in his community, viz the Kashmiri Pandits, being wiped out from their native place. May God save other Hindus from being liberated from such fears by the messiahs that are the pseudo-seculars who are not sensitive to the sinister games of the Shahi imams and Mulayam Singhs.
By prakash
Oct 3, 2010
It is a pity for your ignorance, your lack of desire to know or go to the roots of any problem, and especially a problem of such proportions. You chose to point out fear and politics as the driving force behind Ram Janmabhoomi movement. Please read more history before writing. You seem to be a typical product of a third-rate convent education who hasn't heard of true culture and is a copycat Macaulay product. All Hindus beware of pseudo-secularist, resident non-Indians like you.
By Govind
Oct 3, 2010
Dear All, we have seen the birth of the Shiv Sena and seen it all. Now we see MNS. The most important factor in creating this fear is silent support of the party in power or inaction in maintaining law and order.
By MANIKANT
Oct 3, 2010
Socrates had been a critic of Athenian democracy. Democracy is not the BEST FORM OF GOVERNMENT. It is not even the LCM of the different forms of government. Democracy reduces to mediocrity anything and everything in a civlised society. An early meaning (c. 1500) of the word average is "damage sustained at sea". The root is found in Arabic as awar, in Italian as avaria, in French as avarie and in Dutch as averij. Hence an average adjuster is a person who assesses an insurable loss.
By Venkatesh
Oct 3, 2010
Vivek, take a break and in the meantime get a lesson in Indian history from someone who knows it, not your jholawala types. You and your ilk brashly said there was no temple destroyed and now when the court ruled otherwise, you guys are scurrying for cover.

I understand that this article was written before the verdict, assuming the Muslims were winning and trying to project the Hindu reaction as "fear". Go out and get a life. BTW, communism is dead and so will be the left liberals in JNU. So try and become a real journalist instead of writing crap. If you want to talk of fear and its use by politicians, please write in the context of your Mai-baap party and the left!
By Sudha
Oct 2, 2010
In independent India, Hindus have not got all they deserved. For example, with independence we should have got our temple sites back. The independence we got in 1947 was only against the Britishers, not against the Mughals. Mughals had a barbaric rule and genocides were common. Here the case of the last Hindu emperor Samrat Hemchandra Vikramaditya can be discussed. Though he won several battles against the Mughals in the period 1553-56 and defeated Akbar's forces in Delhi and Agra, he finds no mention in mediaeval history which has been written by Aligarh Muslim University historians after independence. Even in Purana Qila in Delhi, where Hemu had his coronation and established 'Hindu Raj' in North India after defeating Akbar's army in 1556, there is no mention of his name in the history of the fort. I wonder why the Hindu king is eclipsed from history. He had won 22 battles against Mughals from Punjab to Bengal.
By Raj
Oct 2, 2010
One more pseudo-secular writing to fool people in a one-sided fashion... It is a fashion among the so-called Macualay urbanites who are cut off from reality.
By Jawad
Oct 2, 2010
I was very curious and anxious before the decision came out. I was worried that if the decision comes in favour of Muslims, it would lead to another crusade of eliminating Muslims from places where BJP-ruled states didn't want them to prosper. I was very glad the judgement wasn't in favour of Muslims though I belong to the community as I favour peace in the country where people (jobless till the politicians invoke their frustration to come on streets) would simply come on streets by provocation from uneducated goons.
It is a time for introspection for those who claim that Muslims are violent and Hindus are secular for no incident of violence was bought to light in the wake of a judgement which clearly failed to acknowledge that the so-called secular Hindus had indeed adopted a violent inhuman method during 1992.

My opinion is only to wake up those who feel that Muslims are the cause of all the miseries they are facing in this country. For the rest, I still believe that our country has a lot to offer to all communities.
By shiney
Oct 1, 2010
Agree with whatever you say, but it's not always the case that fear is created in minds and then manipulated to suit one's purpose. What was the fear in the case of Ram Janmabhoomi? As hindus we have been losers, whether it was before or after Independence. I come from Karnataka. When I see the ruins of Hampi, when I see the destruction of beautiful temples in so many parts of the state by Muslim invaders and Britishers, it affects me. It doesn't mean that I fear that we will meet the same fate today. On the contrary the best thing about the Ayodhya movement was it awakened our senses and brought the Hindus together as a community, which had never ever happened. We are not inherently a violent people, but 1992 was a wake-up call.

We will no longer give up our rights for the badge of being secular. Secularism doesn't mean I respect all and get trampled by others. Unfortunately non-Hindus and secular Hindus were so used to Hindus giving up without a fight that 1992 came as a shock to them and that's the fear that's currently driving Congress and other secular parties... for a change it's a fear of Hindu backlash that has made them not go over the top in their reaction to the court judgement.

Case after case there is increasing minority terrorism and no one is bothered. Isn't that creating fear? What about the Kerala professor whose hand was chopped? How many national channels and newspapers are covering it?
By Soumyasrajan
Oct 1, 2010
Vivek Kaul and other many column writers, anchors, editors in our mainstream media and press have also depended on creating fear in the country where it does not exist. All examples cited here are from one community. No mention is made that Shiv Sena and MNS are essentially (some people call them illegitimate) children of Congress. Congress uses them as tools whenever it gets into trouble. No mention is made of much violent fears created by the Akali Dal or Muslim extremists and Communist and Congress Socialist etc. support to them.

Silent majority is quite sick of these types of half-baked articles full of superiority complex and hate expressions (I and my colleagues are secular, very intelligent, and whole country is very communal and foolish — when one poses like this he/she should be shown mirror, it will show how foolish such poses look). Actually our mainstream media needs a change of direction and thinking and attitude which reflects respecting others.

For the time being it looks like the judgement of Ram Janmabhoomi/Babri Masjid issue has created much more fear in this brigade. So we will see millions of such articles in the next few days.
By kuldeep
Oct 1, 2010
Excellent blog from Vivek. I'm sure that campaign managers are working on creating/developing some new strategies for the upcoming elections.
By Faisal
Oct 1, 2010
A very well-written blog with exceptional eye-opener research. Keep it up.
By prakash ranjan
Oct 1, 2010
Good one...
By Krishna
Oct 1, 2010
Interesting reading; but why have you left the Congress out of the arena? In your opinion, Congress is unable and incapable of using the FEAR factor? What is secularism? Is it not raised to inculcate fear in the minds of the minorities? Vivek is a clever guy; he can twist the things in a mode he want to showcase them and I appreciate his marketing knowledge; but request him not to try to fool the people with such bad logic.
  


Popular blogs
Most...
©2012 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.
D.0