Follow us:              
You are here: HOME > BLOGS > AMBERISH K DIWANJI

Amberish K Diwanji

Keep English, throw Mulayam out of India

Amberish K Diwanji | Sunday, April 12, 2009

Mulayam Singh Yadav has a lazy ideology which goes like this: if you cannot make the poor rich, then make the rich poor. In Mulayam's case, it applies to language. Since he cannot teach everyone English; he wants no one to learn English. His Samajwadi Party's manifesto speaks of limiting the use of English and computers.

Article continues below the advertisement...

English cannot be banned because it is a global language, spoken across the world. It is the language of business, technology, and education. It is the language a Frenchman and a German are most likely to speak to each other unless one of them knows the other's language. This applies to all the continents in the world today, with perhaps the exception of South America. It is the language required for any job with an international/global aspect; today that applies to virtually all white-collar jobs at senior levels.

China has made learning English a national mission. This rapid spread of English might well make this manufacturing giant into a service giant, eating into what is till now India's domain. Mulayam is then only helping China overtake India in the global service-provider stakes.

Mulayam hasn't offered an alternative to English, perhaps because there is none. The Constitution terms Hindi and English as the official language; but while English is India's working language, Hindi is India's entertainment language. It is the language of films and songs and shayris, of backslapping and merriment. But few outside the northern states actually do work in Hindi.

There is a reason for that. A larger proportion of India's illiterates are from northern India, which means that while they can all speak Hindi, only a handful can read or write it. The educated elites who speak Hindi at home have invariably studied in English-medium schools and colleges (the latter often outside north India), and they remain more comfortable writing and issuing notices in English. No wonder then that since Independence, the use of English in India has increased, not decreased.

One can understand Mulayam's frustration against English, which he sees as denying opportunities to the people he represents, an underclass segment. But the way out is to ensure education for them all with English as a compulsory second language. Some years ago, Mulayam had sought to teach students in UP the Tamil language to compensate for Tamil Nadu students learning Hindi. A decade later, let us ask: how many actually learn Tamil? UP students don't need Tamil unless they go to work in Tamil Nadu (in which case they will anyways learn the language). Instead, if he had then stressed on English, we might have by now been seeing the first lot come out of school with better opportunities. Instead, by railing against English, Mulayam only denied the poorer classes the benefits that the upper-classes continue to benefit from.

In 1977, the communists banned English in government-run schools in West Bengal, where they had come to power. The result was millions of (poor) Bengalis who lacked the means to improve their plight, made worse by the fact that Bengal ceased to offer sufficient job opportunities to its people. But lakhs of the middle-class children went to private schools and learnt good English. They picked up the job opportunities outside Bengal that their poorer cousins forced to study in government-run schools never could.

Mulayam's ideas seeking to ban the use of computers is equally ridiculous and makes him sound like those Taliban sorts. No one can ban technological progress. Trying to do so puts a nation behind and makes it vulnerable as and when the rest of the world changes. It was superior technology that, among other things, helped Britain conquer India. If millions cannot be employed because of computers, it means their education needs to be improved so that they can be put to better use, not to do repetitive tasks that computers can do much better.

That such ridiculous ideas should emanate from a party that aspires to govern India and from a man who has pretensions of becoming the prime minister, are not just disgusting but dangerous for India's future and prosperity. Let us be clear: English and computers will serve India's future far better than Mulayam ever can. That should make it clear what needs to be kept and what can be thrown out.

Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article. For reprint rights click here
Comments  |  Post a comment
By minu
Jul 23, 2009
This is a brave and sensible piece of writing that needs to be passed on to as many people as possible. I am going to pass on this link to all my contacts; I request all right-thinking people to do the same.
Amberish K Diwanji says:

thanks

By minakshee
Jul 23, 2009
*************
Amberish K Diwanji says:

:-/

By Lalitha.S
Apr 24, 2009
This is a brave and sensible piece of writing that needs to be passed on to as many people as possible. I am going to pass on this link to all my contacts; I request all right-thinking people to do the same.
By Santosh
Apr 17, 2009
Good article. I wonder how Mulayam, who himself was a teacher at one time, can agree to such an idea. But going by his deeds in politics, it fits his standards. It was Mulayam who has loosened the examination procedure in UP, which has resulted in the passing of many students by copying. This has worsened the quality of students who pass out from the UP board. He has come up with this idea only to gain instant recognition amongst the boys who would have been denied some jobs owing to a lack of English knowledge. God save my country from such politicians.
By Sanjeev Jain
Apr 14, 2009
Mulayam is a crackpot, total nut. By the way, I want to know if Mulayam released his party manifesto in English and if it was designed and written on a computer. Any answers?
Amberish K Diwanji says:

Good points. His manifesto was in Hindi. But given how publishing technology works today, there is no way it could have been prepared without computers at some level. Today, most publishing is done through desk top computers, whether it is writing or designing, and pages are transmitted via computers on to the printing plates for printing. You can print without computers, but today that actually becomes more expensive!

By sachin
Apr 13, 2009
Does Mulayam have any idea how much manpower, time, money, etc will be required to transform all transactions, data, and other facts to go into paper and language change?
By viju
Apr 13, 2009
That was a well-written column. I cannot but whole-heartedly agree with your views!
It's the same as MNS insisting on only Marathi in Maharashtra.
Amberish K Diwanji says:

Thanks viju!

By Deepen Kumar
Apr 13, 2009
Aaj se English... maaf keejiye Angrezi... 'blaag' padhna band. Kampootar pe padhna band. Kripaya yehi cheez Hindi ya koi aur desi bhasha mein, ek kagaz pe likh ke sab padhne walon ko daak se bhejiye.
By Harsh
Apr 13, 2009
Mulayam is probably just reflecting the opinion of sections of the Hindi belt which have always been hostile to English. It has always been the dream of these sections to push Hindi down the throats of everyone in India, be they from Tamilnadu, Assam, or Andhra Pradesh. Hindi has always been used as an instrument of North India's hegemony over the rest of the country. Mulayam is one of the symptoms of this malaise. This whole 'national language' concept is one of our sacred cows, which has to be done away with. Trying to ram Hindi down the throats of Tamilians and Bengalis doesn't make it the 'national language'. Mulayam's rhetoric is just part of this wider notion that many in the North have about Hindi.
  


Popular blogs
Most...
©2012 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.
D.0