Malavika Sangghvi

Words have been my habitat, ideas my oxygen, writing the meeting ground.

I write about love and longing, history and heartbreak, sex and satiation, music and memory, gender and jealousy and yes- even gobhis and governments.

 

 


Other bloggers
R JAGANNATHAN
AYAZ MEMON
SIDHARTH BHATIA
SATHYA SARAN
SHYAM PAREKH
RANJONA BANERJI
VIVEK KAUL
ABHAY VAIDYA
VENKATESAN VEMBU
SUMIT CHAKRABERTY
G SAMPATH
DHANANJAY KHADILKAR
ANTHONY D'COSTA
AMBERISH K DIWANJI
MAYANK TEWARI

Why didn't the cops use Qasab for information and leverage from 26 Nov itself???

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 16:22 IST
Email Email
Print Print
Share Share
This is something that’s been bothering me ever since I heard Mohd. Ajmal Qasab’s confession last night on the TV channels, and then read it in Mid-day this afternoon.

The police had captured him on the night of 26 November after he’d killed people at CST and then on the roads of South Mumbai.

For 60 hours as the hostage crisis at Taj, Oberoi and Nariman House unfolded-they had one of the terrorists in their captivity!!!

They had access to his cell-phone- and thus to his masters. They were in a position to extract information from him. He must have given them a pretty good idea of the extent of their plan, their firearms, and their goal. They could have used him for leverage against his instigators-or against the Pakistani Government (if you don’t stop your men now –we have one of yours –and we will use him to expose you internationally!). There were a million things they could have used Mohd. Ajmal Qasab for.

And yet, we see on CCTV footage at the Taj that before the NSG arrived policemen were running down the corridors without bullet proof vests without adequate firearms without forces to confront the enormity of the challenge.

Even after Qasab must have told them to what extent they had been prepared. Even when they could have surmised from his weaponry and his training where he had come from. Even when they must have known to what deadly extent their mission had been planned. Even when precious lives were at stake!

I can’t figure this out. Perhaps I don’t know enough. But will some one please explain why when we had captured one of the terrorists on the night of the 26th itself-and we were in a position of leverage and information-we didn’t act on it faster?

3 comments


Newer post
Older post
By Surya
May 8, 2009
How do you know they have not gathered information from him? In any case, how do u believe he is giving correct information? Since the country is disintegrating, there is no point blaming Pakistan. The international community knows about the involvement of Pakistan. So why is the US still giving it money?
By shankar
Dec 23, 2008
It is evident from the way the situation was handled that the administration was not geared to face attacks of this magnitude. It is essential to do a postmortem because at least the people at the helm of affairs will come to know that people are aware of the lapses. We must realise that unless corruption is weeded out, our state of affairs can't improve. From where can we bring money to modernise our police forces if government funds are pocketed by corrupt politicians, babus, and contractors?
By Rishi
Dec 12, 2008
Please do not paint our police as being so stupid. They must have done what they deemed necessary. We ought to support them and enable the police to receive the best possible arms and training to handle things better in future.

The problem in our country is that each of us thinks we are the most intelligent and others are fools. If each of us concentrates on our jobs, the police on theirs, the country will benefit.

About us | Contact us | Advertise with us | Subscription | Reprint rights
© 2005-2009 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd. All rights reserved.
D