In My Blog Opinion...
What George Bernard Shaw actually meant to say went something like this: 'Those who can, do; those who can't, teach (or write or blog!). But those who can, and do, often do so after reading the teachings (or writings or blogs!) of those who can't.
When senior leaders sought a discussion on the party's debacle, they were silenced. Then the party asked Vasundhara Raje to quit as leader of the opposition in the Rajasthan assembly, on the grounds that she had to take responsibility for the BJP's defeat in that state. That principle is fine, but should it not apply on the likes of LK Advani and Rajnath Singh, the men at the helm and who thus bear the maximum responsibility for the party's descent into irrelevance.
Second, if Jaswant is to be held guilty of praising Jinnah, then Advani too must be held equally guilty of saluting Jinnah during a visit to Pakistan in 2005. So how is it that one person (Jaswant) is expelled while the other (Advani) after stepping down as party president, is projected as the BJP's candidate for the post of prime minister? The vast difference would be funny were it not so tragic.
The third issue is Jaswant's fundamental right, as articulated in Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, to the Freedom of Expression. The BJP considers itself the champion of nationalism and a believer in the Constitution, then why is it denying its own member his fundamental rights.
Linked to this is the question of inner party democracy. Tragically for our political parties, democracy has simply come to mean voting on election day to choose the next leader. It is not a philosophy they believe in or even care about. No party allows democracy within its ranks, and those who choose to be different are invariably expelled. Thus while one condemns the BJP for expelling Jaswant, the fact is that if a Congress party member were to write a book saying that maybe Nathuram Godse wasn't all that bad or that Rajiv Gandhi faltered badly in theShah Bano case; or if a communist were to write a book not condemning Hedgewar, chances are they will be expelled. It is time our political parties embraced democracy.
Beyond these three issues is the larger question of judging our leaders and shedding light on our history. Our understanding of history will change as time goes by and distance lends perspective. Banning a book or expelling an author only displays a Talibanic streak that is hardly compatible with a nation that wants to be considered a knowledge superpower. For instance, will the Labour Party expel Gordon Brown, who has said he wants to write a book on Gandhi? The Mahatma was, after all, responsible for ending the British Empire in India.
What Jaswant has done is to raise questions about Jinnah's role and ask what led this man to partition India. It is a question others have asked and will ask. There are millions of Indians, including nationalist Hindus, who hold Nehru and Gandhi responsible for partition. Jinnah had famously defended Lokmanya Tilak in 1916, a fact that still resonates within Maharashtra. He played a prominent role in the Hindu-Muslim unity pact. So what led him to demand Pakistan? Alternatively, Gandhi and Nehru (and Patel) were committed to a united India. So why did they cave in and agree to Jinnah's demand after years of refusing to heed him? These questions remain and will need answers.
Jaswant Singh is no doubt upset at the horrendous treatment meted out to him but in this battle, he is on the side of truth. All that one can say to him is to soldier on - in the finest traditions of the Indian Armed Forces - of the thinking politician, alas, a disappearing tribe. He has merely lost his membership of the party; the BJP has lost its mind.