Amberish K Diwanji

In My Blog Opinion...

What George Bernard Shaw actually meant to say went something like this: 'Those who can, do; those who can't, teach (or write or blog!). But those who can, and do, often do so after reading the teachings (or writings or blogs!) of those who can't.


Other bloggers
R JAGANNATHAN
AYAZ MEMON
SIDHARTH BHATIA
MALAVIKA SANGGHVI
SATHYA SARAN
SHYAM PAREKH
RANJONA BANERJI
VIVEK KAUL
ABHAY VAIDYA
VENKATESAN VEMBU
SUMIT CHAKRABERTY
G SAMPATH
DHANANJAY KHADILKAR
ANTHONY D'COSTA
MAYANK TEWARI

Hail Kalam, search everyone

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 20:05 IST
Email Email
Print Print
Share Share
The brouhaha over former president APJ Abdul Kalam being frisked makes for interesting reading. Our politicians have gone into a lather over what they term the “mistreatment” meted out to Abdul Kalam. The charitable view is that our politicians were upset at the treatment meted out to India’s former Head of State, a man who had endeared himself with his simplicity, down-to-earth attitude, and his poverty-to-glory story. He is a person easily recognised on the streets today.

Kalam as president cared little for protocol, much of which was derived from the British rulers of yore. For instance, there is a staff member to help the president remove and put on his shoes. Abdul Kalam had stopped this practise, removing and wearing his shoes himself. And so, in a similar vein, when asked to empty his pockets before entering the aircraft, he did so with minimum fuss.

Now compare this with the way our politicians behave. Some years ago the then Lok Sabha speaker Somnath Chatterjee refused to fly when he was told that he would NOT be exempted from being frisked/search at US airports. There was a ruckus in Parliament after George Fernandes was searched at a US airport. Then there is the strange case of Anand Sharma. In the last government, this then minister of state in the ministry of external affairs had thrown a fit when he had to go through security checks while boarding a flight in New Delhi. A craven government quickly had the rules changed; thus, all ministers of state are now exempt from security checks.

This is the real problem.

India’s list of people exempted from security checks airport is virtually endless and includes not just the president and former presidents along with the vice-presidents but also the prime ministers and all ministers and ministers of state; governors, chief ministers and deputy chief ministers of all states and union territories; Supreme Court justices and high court chief justices; cabinet secretary and chiefs of staff of the armed forces; and all members of the Sonia Gandhi family. That works out to some 200 persons and counting, which is, frankly, 190 too many! You can also be sure this list will rise as ever more politicians and bureaucrats insist on the same privileges.

Abdul Kalam wasn’t insulted by Continental airlines; he was insulted by the Government of India that treats Kalam no better than a minister of state for sports (er, what’s his name?). And for those who are angry with the US for frisking Kalam, please note: after September 11, 2001, there have been no major attacks in the US; after the attack on Indian parliament on December 13, 2001, India suffered an even bigger attack on November 26, 2008. Our security checks are a joke, and the way we exempt every minister, judge and babu from search merely reflects this disdain.

Oh! before we forget: terrorists entered Parliament in a white car, looking very much like ministers and hence were not stopped by the protocol-conscious security men. How long before a bomb-laden terrorist walks in claiming he is a minister and hence cannot be searched?

Incidentally, parliamentarians are now demanding that India must no longer exempt foreign dignitaries/ambassadors from being searched or frisked. But the only reason they were exempted in the first place was because our politicians expected a reciprocal privilege.

It is high time India did away unnecessary privileges for politicians and bureaucrats. We can start by removing the red lights on their cars, a relic of the British raj that was created to awe the natives and which continues for the same reason. Our politicians are no better than us; they cannot be exempt from security searches, here or abroad. If a giant like Kalam doesn't mind being frisked, then for sure these men and women, who are pygmies in comparison with the ex-president, should not mind either.

13 comments


Newer post
Older post
By Dildar
Aug 1, 2009
Yes, pygmies should not be insulted.
By Ram Raj
Jul 25, 2009
Please do not insult pygmies.
By Dee Mann
Jul 23, 2009
I fully agree! Thank you.
By AJ
Jul 22, 2009
Good article. Everyone should be searched except for the current/ex-Presidents/PMs. And this must hold true for foreign heads of state too.
By Udai Kumar Jain
Jul 22, 2009
A person of the stature of Mr Kalam can never be insulted by anyone. In fact, the incident is a little glimpse (amplified by politicians) of the greatness contained by this man. Compliance to safety rules has been followed by Mr Kalam with simplicity and without any fuss.

However, non-compliance with any protocol should be confessed with the same greatness and honesty by the airline’s management.
By Ram
Jul 22, 2009
Is this a joke? Who cares about politicians? The concern is that the ex-president is frisked. Will they do it to Bush or Bill Clinton or any other ex-US president? For that matter, any ex-president or ex-premier of a major nation? This happens because in spite of the apparent importance of India as a major nation, the truth is that India is considered similar to an African undeveloped country.
Amberish K Diwanji says:

When we demand that every two bit politician be exempt from searches, we behave like a two-bit African nation!

By Vikram Raghavan
Jul 22, 2009
Very good and sane post.
By abhijeet
Jul 22, 2009
Really thanks for your view. And long live our dear former president.
By Ankur Gupta
Jul 22, 2009
I totally agree with you, Mr Diwanji. I dont think Mr Kalam had ever thought about it after his security check, but it is our media which is making it an issue. There should not be any exception as far as security is concerned.
By Vaibhav
Jul 22, 2009
Aptly put and well supported. NO Indian citizens have any respect for politicians and bureaucrats. Because of tainted politicians and bureaucrats, noble men like Dr Kalam received bad treatment.
Amberish K Diwanji says:

:-)

By Anil Nair
Jul 22, 2009
While I respect the opinion that the list of legally exempt people may be bloated, it is still no excuse for the airline to flout the law and frisk our former President. No self-respecting nation should stand being ridiculed thus.
Amberish K Diwanji says:

I agree. Kalam should not have been frisked. But when the government submits lists of 200 persons, who will take it seriously?

By javaid
Jul 22, 2009
It happens only with Indian leaders with US or French airlines because they don't trust us...
By amo
Jul 22, 2009
Our respectable former President is always an example for us to lead our life. We respect him and he respects the rules and laws of the world. Who on earth can humiliate him?
Amberish K Diwanji says:

:-)


About us | Contact us | Advertise with us | Subscription | Reprint rights
© 2005-2009 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd. All rights reserved.
C