Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi will not find it easy, despite the huge support from big industry in India, to ensconce himself as the prime minister of this burgeoning, and at times confused, secular democracy. The decision by the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania has demonstrated that despite strident support from sections within India, the pariah status for Modi has still not ended. And he still cannot travel to the US and European Union member nations, except for the UK and Germany that have just lifted the ban on issuing him a visa.
Wharton’s decision has triggered off a debate in the name of ‘democracy’ with union minister of state for human resource and development Shashi Tharoor supporting Modi’s right to free speech. In his view Wharton should have heard Modi as “once they had invited him, they had a duty to hear his point of view”. This echoes the sentiments of the chattering classes in the rich drawing rooms of India, who speak of democracy with great passion but choose to forget that the Preamble of the Indian Constitution has linked this to the important concept of ‘secularism’ that is linked intricately and irrevocably to Indian democracy. And the one cannot exist without the other.
The letter sent by students, academics, lawyers, doctors and concerned citizens to Wharton protesting against the invite sent to Modi to deliver a keynote address made some important observations that are shared by a large majority in India.
One, that he had been refused a visa by the US state department “on the ground that he, as chief minister, did nothing to prevent a series of orchestrated riots that targeted Muslims in Gujarat”; two, he has been “repeatedly faulted” since by the Supreme Court of India for “failing to prosecute those guilty of the crimes of 2002”; three, that economic development cannot be de-linked from “the systematic oppression of minority populations, whether in India or elsewhere”; four, that efforts to “whitewash Modi’s grim record and to grant him international respectability” must be resisted.
The same arguments had led to a big protest at Delhi University when Modi came to the campus to deliver a lecture at the Shri ram College of Commerce. SRCC, however, chose to disregard the protest, and continued with the event as part of the larger efforts by sections to de-link oppression from economic reforms.
The BJP is currently in the midst of active debate about its ‘star’ chief minister. There is a strong lobby led by stalwart LK Advani that is not particularly supportive of him leading the BJP into the 2014 general elections and is working to thwart the move. It is thus, imperative for Modi to convince the party that he is capable of fetching the votes to silence the internal opposition, and this is precisely what he is doing with the help of industry and the media.
He is being given a major makeover, a larger than life profile wherein he is projected as being this whiz kid with purpose and direction, who can transform not just Gujarat but India into a booming economy. In the process no questions are being asked as statistics are reeled out on development, with little being reported about the continuing struggle within the state by India’s largest minority and the secularists for justice and rights.
However, there can be no two views that if Modi manages to convince the country of his potential, the BJP will unite behind him as the prime ministerial candidate. The party, with the RSS and the front organisations, will then work towards creating a wave in favour of Modi with the intention of securing at least 200 parliamentary seats, if not more. Modi’s chances of becoming the prime minister thus, are linked to the BJP emerging as the single largest party with at least 200 seats to ensure that the shortfall is made up by supporting regional parties without much difficulty.
Lesser numbers will rake up ambitions within regional parties that might then not want to support the BJP, Modi or no Modi. For example if AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa, a professed Modi fan, gets sufficient numbers against low performance of the BJP she might prefer to stake claim herself, or help bring in another regional party to lead the government where she can then have bigger say.
Efforts to reinvent Modi in the light of a Atal Bihari Vajpayee by sections of the BJP have not worked, with many seeing these as “a joke”. It is clear that Modi cannot hope to wear the Vajpayee mantle, and will have to find his own slot in the BJP and amongst its supporters. Interestingly, the Congress party has moved quickly to prevent the election scenario from becoming a Rahul Gandhi versus Modi face-off, with the former claiming that he is not interested in becoming the prime minister. The elections will not be a cakewalk for Modi that is certain, and he will have to do all that he can to prevent it from becoming uncomfortably bumpy.
The writer is a senior New Delhi-based journalist
inbox@dnaindia.net
Most Popular
- IPL 6: Rajasthan Royals beat SRH by 4 wickets; to play Mumbai Indians for place in the final - 15 hours ago
- Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra's son Viaan gets a Lamborghini as first birthday gift - 16 hours ago
- Sizzling chemistry continues between Ranbir Kapoor, Deepika Padukone despite break-up - 13 hours ago
- Nod for quadricycle boosts sole maker Bajaj Auto - 2 hours ago
- Soldier hacked to death in London street in suspected Islamist attack, Nigerian link possible - 2 hours ago
- Angelina Jolie makes Jennifer Aniston cry - 20 hours ago
- Goa MIT student Andrea Colaco invents gesture-recognition smartphone technology - 17 hours ago
- The Michael Hussey-Suresh Raina show - 1 day ago
- Sreesanth may claim innocence but - 1 hour ago
- Two cops part of CM Akhilesh Yadav's security, seen hitting each other with lathis - 19 hours ago







